PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDGQ vs. TSMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDGQ vs. TSMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EDGQ

1D
0.86%
1M
-2.56%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

TSMY

1D
0.66%
1M
-4.22%
6M
21.94%
YTD
30.47%
1Y
60.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
42.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$370.87K$410.33K$365.52K
$2.14M$3.13M$3.04M

EDGQ vs. TSMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EDGQ and TSMY is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDGQ vs. TSMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EDGQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


TSMY
TSMY Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
TSMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EDGQ vs. TSMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDGQTSMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.72

EDGQ vs. TSMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDGQ vs. TSMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGQ drawdown since its inception was -10.10%, smaller than the maximum TSMY drawdown of -31.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGQ and TSMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDGQTSMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.10%

-31.15%

+21.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.48%

-11.66%

+5.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.30%

-5.63%

+3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.33%

Volatility

EDGQ vs. TSMY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDGQTSMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.18%

33.77%

-13.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.18%

34.64%

-14.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.18%

34.64%

-14.46%

EDGQ vs. TSMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGQ has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than TSMY's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDGQ vs. TSMY - Dividend Comparison

EDGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, less than TSMY's 58.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
EDGQ
Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF
5.71%0.00%0.00%
TSMY
YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF
58.31%56.76%13.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDGQ and TSMY have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EDGQ is cheaper at 0.53% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EDGQ is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TSMY.

TSMY has the higher dividend yield at 58.31%, compared with 5.71% for EDGQ.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDGQ and 1.01% for TSMY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDGQ and TSMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer