EDGQ vs. THTA

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EDGQ (Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF) and THTA (SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EDGQ charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for THTA.

Performance

EDGQ vs. THTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EDGQ

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -2.56%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

THTA

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 1.37%
• 6M: 8.16%
• YTD: 9.50%
• 1Y: 16.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF	$370.87K	$410.33K	$365.52K
THTA SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF	$817.63K	$892.94K	$775.79K

EDGQ vs. THTA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF	12.28%
THTA SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF	7.05%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGQ and THTA is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026	0.42

Return for Risk

EDGQ vs. THTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EDGQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

THTA

THTA Risk / Return Rank: 96
THTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
THTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
THTA Omega Ratio Rank: 97
THTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
THTA Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EDGQ vs. THTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EDGQ	THTA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.75	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.14	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.69	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	6.44	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	47.60	—

Drawdowns

EDGQ vs. THTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGQ drawdown since its inception was -10.10%, smaller than the maximum THTA drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGQ and THTA.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDGQ	THTA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.10%	-31.41%	+21.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.48%	-4.49%	-1.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-7.42%	+5.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.36%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EDGQ	THTA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.29%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.85%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.18%	6.17%	+14.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.18%	19.69%	+0.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.18%	19.69%	+0.49%

EDGQ vs. THTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGQ has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than THTA's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDGQ vs. THTA - Dividend Comparison

EDGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, less than THTA's 10.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF	5.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
THTA SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF	10.90%	12.66%	12.44%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDGQ and THTA in my portfolio?

EDGQ and THTA have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EDGQ or THTA?

On fees, THTA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDGQ or THTA?

THTA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for EDGQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDGQ or THTA?

THTA has the higher dividend yield at 10.90%, compared with 5.71% for EDGQ.

What is the main difference between EDGQ and THTA?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and SoFi. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDGQ and 0.49% for THTA.