EDGQ vs. PEPS
EDGQ (Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF) and PEPS (Parametric Equity Plus ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EDGQ charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for PEPS.
Performance
EDGQ vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EDGQ
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEPS
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 5.83%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 32.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDGQ vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF | 19.41% |
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 10.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDGQ and PEPS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDGQ vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank
EDGQ
PEPS
EDGQ vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDGQ | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.23 | 1.06 | +4.17 |
Drawdowns
EDGQ vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDGQ drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum PEPS drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGQ and PEPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDGQ | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -21.26% | +13.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.13% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.28% | -2.76% | +1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.09% | — |
Volatility
EDGQ vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDGQ | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.97% | 13.05% | +2.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 18.28% | -2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 18.28% | -2.31% |
EDGQ vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDGQ has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDGQ vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison
EDGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than PEPS's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 0.88% | 1.00% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, EDGQ and PEPS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for EDGQ.
EDGQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 0.88% for PEPS.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDGQ and 0.10% for PEPS.
Find the right allocation for EDGQ and PEPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer