EDGQ vs. BUYW
EDGQ (Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF) and BUYW (Main Buywrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDGQ charges 0.53%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for BUYW.
Performance
EDGQ vs. BUYW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EDGQ
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUYW
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 4.20%
- 6M
- 4.20%
- 1Y
- 9.05%
- 3Y*
- 8.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDGQ vs. BUYW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF | 17.15% |
BUYW Main Buywrite ETF | 3.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDGQ and BUYW is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDGQ vs. BUYW — Risk / Return Rank
EDGQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BUYW
EDGQ vs. BUYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDGQ | BUYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.51 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 18.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDGQ vs. BUYW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDGQ drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum BUYW drawdown of -9.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGQ and BUYW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDGQ | BUYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -9.36% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.43% | 0.00% | -2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.64% | -0.60% | -1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.49% | — |
Volatility
EDGQ vs. BUYW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDGQ | BUYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.79% | 4.86% | +14.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 8.41% | +11.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 8.41% | +11.38% |
EDGQ vs. BUYW - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDGQ has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than BUYW's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDGQ vs. BUYW - Dividend Comparison
EDGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, less than BUYW's 5.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYW Main Buywrite ETF | 5.91% | 5.89% | 5.93% | 5.95% | 0.50% |
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF | 4.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDGQ and BUYW have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EDGQ is cheaper at 0.53% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDGQ is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BUYW.
BUYW has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 4.45% for EDGQ.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Main Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDGQ and 1.29% for BUYW.
Find the right allocation for EDGQ and BUYW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer