PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDGH vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDGH vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDGH achieves a 12.49% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.17% return.


EDGH

1D
-0.45%
1M
-1.84%
YTD
12.49%
6M
14.30%
1Y
31.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.17%
1M
4.42%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.05%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGH vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EDGH
3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF
12.49%28.98%-1.99%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
7.17%9.04%14.81%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGH and YCS is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024

-0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDGH vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDGH
EDGH Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
EDGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDGH Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EDGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDGH Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDGH vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDGHYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.35

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

3.97

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.70

12.40

-2.70

EDGH vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDGH Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDGH and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDGHYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

1.92

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

0.33

+1.20

Drawdowns

EDGH vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGH drawdown since its inception was -10.60%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGH and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDGHYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.60%

-49.56%

+38.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.60%

-8.30%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.80%

0.00%

-4.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.04%

-19.93%

+17.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

2.66%

+0.57%

Volatility

EDGH vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that EDGH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDGHYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

2.75%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.72%

12.32%

+2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.72%

17.27%

+0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.60%

21.10%

-5.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.60%

19.01%

-3.41%

EDGH vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGH has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDGH vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

EDGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
EDGH
3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF
1.05%1.18%3.19%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDGH and YCS have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDGH has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDGH dropped -10.60% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 1-year performance, YCS leads with 32.82% vs 31.24% for EDGH. On fees, YCS is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YCS has performed better with a 32.82% return vs 31.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YCS is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for EDGH.

EDGH has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

EDGH is categorized as Commodities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: 3EDGE Asset Management and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for EDGH and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDGH and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer