PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDGF vs. PCRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDGF vs. PCRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF) and Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EDGF

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.06%
6M
0.93%
YTD
1.01%
1Y
2.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PCRB

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGF vs. PCRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EDGF
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
1.01%4.36%-1.41%
PCRB
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -
-0.48%7.21%-3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGF and PCRB is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024

0.68

The correlation between EDGF and PCRB shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDGF vs. PCRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDGF
EDGF Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
EDGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDGF Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EDGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDGF Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PCRB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDGF vs. PCRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF) and Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDGFPCRBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.83

EDGF vs. PCRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDGF vs. PCRB - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDGFPCRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

Volatility

EDGF vs. PCRB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDGFPCRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.30%

EDGF vs. PCRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PCRB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDGF vs. PCRB - Dividend Comparison

EDGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, while PCRB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
EDGF
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
3.22%3.61%0.49%0.00%
PCRB
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -
9.42%4.30%4.38%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDGF and PCRB have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PCRB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PCRB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for EDGF.

PCRB has the higher dividend yield at 9.42%, compared with 3.22% for EDGF.

They also come from different issuers: 3EDGE Asset Management and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for EDGF and 0.35% for PCRB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDGF and PCRB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer