EDGF vs. PCRB
EDGF (3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF) and PCRB (Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDGF charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PCRB.
Performance
EDGF vs. PCRB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EDGF
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 2.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCRB
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDGF vs. PCRB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EDGF 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 1.01% | 4.36% | -1.41% |
PCRB Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - | -0.48% | 7.21% | -3.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDGF and PCRB is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024 | 0.68 |
The correlation between EDGF and PCRB shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDGF vs. PCRB — Risk / Return Rank
EDGF
PCRB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EDGF vs. PCRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF) and Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDGF | PCRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.83 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDGF vs. PCRB - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDGF | PCRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.44% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | — | — |
Volatility
EDGF vs. PCRB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDGF | PCRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.30% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.30% | — | — |
EDGF vs. PCRB - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDGF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PCRB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDGF vs. PCRB - Dividend Comparison
EDGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, while PCRB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EDGF 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 3.22% | 3.61% | 0.49% | 0.00% |
PCRB Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - | 9.42% | 4.30% | 4.38% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDGF and PCRB have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PCRB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PCRB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for EDGF.
PCRB has the higher dividend yield at 9.42%, compared with 3.22% for EDGF.
They also come from different issuers: 3EDGE Asset Management and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for EDGF and 0.35% for PCRB.
Find the right allocation for EDGF and PCRB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer