PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDGE vs. APMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDGE vs. APMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF (EDGE) and ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDGE achieves a 9.19% return, which is significantly higher than APMU's 0.44% return.


EDGE

1D
-0.24%
1M
3.49%
YTD
9.19%
6M
10.97%
1Y
28.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APMU

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.44%
6M
0.72%
1Y
4.28%
3Y*
3.03%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGE vs. APMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EDGE and APMU is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDGE vs. APMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDGE
EDGE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
EDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

APMU
APMU Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
APMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
APMU Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
APMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
APMU Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDGE vs. APMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF (EDGE) and ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDGEAPMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.38

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

1.79

+1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.20

5.30

+11.90

EDGE vs. APMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDGE Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the APMU Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDGE and APMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDGEAPMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

1.81

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

0.82

+0.24

Drawdowns

EDGE vs. APMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGE drawdown since its inception was -20.66%, which is greater than APMU's maximum drawdown of -4.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGE and APMU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDGEAPMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.66%

-4.39%

-16.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-2.40%

-6.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-1.17%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.85%

-0.93%

-1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

0.81%

+0.88%

Volatility

EDGE vs. APMU - Volatility Comparison

MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF (EDGE) has a higher volatility of 1.80% compared to ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU) at 0.75%. This indicates that EDGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDGEAPMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.80%

0.75%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

1.68%

+7.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.28%

2.37%

+8.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.95%

2.81%

+13.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.95%

2.81%

+13.14%

EDGE vs. APMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than APMU's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDGE vs. APMU - Dividend Comparison

EDGE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%.


PositionTTM202520242023
APMU
ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF
2.66%2.63%2.42%1.31%
EDGE
MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDGE and APMU have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDGE has higher volatility (1.80%) compared to APMU (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDGE dropped -20.66% vs APMU's -4.39%.

On 1-year performance, EDGE leads with 28.99% vs 4.28% for APMU. On fees, APMU is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, APMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EDGE has performed better with a 28.99% return vs 4.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

APMU is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for EDGE.

APMU has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.00% for EDGE.

EDGE is categorized as Derivative Income, while APMU is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: MRBL and ActivePassive. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for EDGE and 0.36% for APMU.

EDGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDGE and APMU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer