EDEN vs. SOXX
EDEN (iShares MSCI Denmark ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDEN is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EDEN returned 8.21%/yr vs 35.54%/yr for SOXX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDEN charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
EDEN vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDEN achieves a -3.46% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 100.26% return. Over the past 10 years, EDEN has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 8.21%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 35.54% annualized return.
EDEN
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- -3.46%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- 1Y
- -1.91%
- 3Y*
- 3.27%
- 5Y*
- 2.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
SOXX
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- 24.86%
- YTD
- 100.26%
- 6M
- 97.20%
- 1Y
- 179.78%
- 3Y*
- 57.09%
- 5Y*
- 33.93%
- 10Y*
- 35.54%
EDEN vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | -3.46% | 10.58% | -3.94% | 17.99% | -11.47% | 14.81% | 42.56% | 24.37% | -14.43% | 35.39% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 100.26% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDEN and SOXX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2012 | 0.46 |
EDEN vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDEN
SOXX
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Healthcare
EDEN
SOXX
-
Industrials
EDEN
SOXX
-
Financial Services
EDEN
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
EDEN
SOXX
-
Basic Materials
EDEN
SOXX
-
Utilities
EDEN
SOXX
-
Consumer Cyclical
EDEN
SOXX
-
Technology
EDEN
SOXX
Energy
EDEN
SOXX
-
Communication Services
EDEN
-
SOXX
-
Real Estate
EDEN
-
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDEN vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
EDEN
SOXX
EDEN vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDEN | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.71 | -0.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 11.48 | -11.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.19 | 43.90 | -44.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDEN | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | 5.29 | -5.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.94 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 1.07 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.44 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
EDEN vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDEN drawdown since its inception was -36.61%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDEN and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDEN | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.61% | -70.21% | +33.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.17% | -15.77% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.31% | -41.36% | +12.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.61% | -45.75% | +9.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.61% | -45.75% | +9.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.92% | -2.10% | -11.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -19.97% | +12.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.07% | 4.11% | +5.96% |
Volatility
EDEN vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) is 4.99%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 14.08%. This indicates that EDEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDEN | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | 14.08% | -9.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.69% | 27.45% | -11.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.90% | 34.20% | -13.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.22% | 36.11% | -15.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.44% | 33.43% | -13.99% |
EDEN vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDEN has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDEN vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
EDEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than SOXX's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | 2.89% | 2.79% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 1.47% | 0.74% | 0.42% | 2.36% | 2.01% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 1.46% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.28% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDEN and SOXX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (14.08%) compared to EDEN (4.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDEN dropped -36.61% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 35.54% vs 8.21% for EDEN. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, EDEN has been the lower-risk option at 4.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 35.54% return vs 8.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for EDEN.
EDEN has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.28% for SOXX.
EDEN is categorized as Europe Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. EDEN tracks MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDEN and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.29 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDEN and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer