EDEN vs. SGOV
EDEN (iShares MSCI Denmark ETF) and SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDEN is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index, while SGOV is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDEN returned 1.78%/yr vs 3.54%/yr for SGOV. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. EDEN charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SGOV.
Performance
EDEN vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDEN achieves a -4.94% return, which is significantly lower than SGOV's 1.51% return.
EDEN
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- -4.94%
- 6M
- -1.08%
- 1Y
- -2.21%
- 3Y*
- 2.62%
- 5Y*
- 1.78%
- 10Y*
- 8.04%
SGOV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.54%
- 10Y*
- —
EDEN vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | -4.94% | 10.58% | -3.94% | 17.99% | -11.47% | 14.81% | 37.99% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 1.51% | 4.24% | 5.27% | 5.12% | 1.58% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDEN and SGOV is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2020 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDEN vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank
EDEN
SGOV
EDEN vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDEN | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -20.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -275.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 195.55 | -194.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 398.20 | -398.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 4,462.00 | -4,462.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDEN | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 | 20.28 | -20.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 14.73 | -14.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 12.48 | -11.85 |
Drawdowns
EDEN vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDEN drawdown since its inception was -36.61%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDEN and SGOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDEN | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.61% | -0.03% | -36.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.17% | -0.01% | -21.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.31% | -0.01% | -29.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.61% | -0.03% | -36.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.24% | 0.00% | -15.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -0.00% | -7.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.04% | 0.00% | +10.04% |
Volatility
EDEN vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.05%. This indicates that EDEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDEN | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 0.05% | +4.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.61% | 0.13% | +15.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.92% | 0.20% | +20.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 0.24% | +19.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 0.24% | +19.19% |
EDEN vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDEN has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDEN vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison
EDEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than SGOV's 3.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | 2.93% | 2.79% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 1.47% | 0.74% | 0.42% | 2.36% | 2.01% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 1.46% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 3.86% | 4.10% | 5.10% | 4.87% | 1.45% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDEN and SGOV have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDEN has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to SGOV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDEN dropped -36.61% vs SGOV's -0.03%.
On 5-year performance, SGOV leads with 3.54% vs 1.78% for EDEN. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SGOV has performed better with a 3.54% return vs 1.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for EDEN.
SGOV has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 2.93% for EDEN.
EDEN is categorized as Europe Equities, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. EDEN tracks MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDEN and 0.09% for SGOV.
SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.28 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDEN and SGOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer