PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDEN vs. OPPE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDEN vs. OPPE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) and WisdomTree European Opportunities Fund (OPPE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDEN achieves a -4.94% return, which is significantly lower than OPPE's 12.95% return. Over the past 10 years, EDEN has underperformed OPPE with an annualized return of 8.04%, while OPPE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.39% annualized return.


EDEN

1D
-1.04%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
-4.94%
6M
-1.08%
1Y
-2.21%
3Y*
2.62%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
8.04%

OPPE

1D
-0.60%
1M
3.71%
YTD
12.95%
6M
16.25%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
23.31%
5Y*
14.10%
10Y*
12.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDEN vs. OPPE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
-4.94%10.58%-3.94%17.99%-11.47%14.81%42.56%24.37%-14.43%35.39%
OPPE
WisdomTree European Opportunities Fund
12.95%38.80%10.42%19.80%-11.14%23.52%-2.92%28.60%-13.34%22.25%

Correlation

The correlation between EDEN and OPPE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2015

0.63

The correlation between EDEN and OPPE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

EDEN vs. OPPE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDEN
OPPE

Healthcare

34.8%
4.8%

Industrials

31.3%
27.8%

Financial Services

16.2%
23.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.6%

Basic Materials

4.8%
10.6%

Utilities

3.9%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

2.0%
3.1%

Technology

1.1%
7.2%

Energy

1.1%
9.1%

Communication Services

-

1.6%

Real Estate

-

1.4%

Healthcare

EDEN
34.8%
OPPE
4.8%

Industrials

EDEN
31.3%
OPPE
27.8%

Financial Services

EDEN
16.2%
OPPE
23.3%

Consumer Defensive

EDEN
4.9%
OPPE
4.6%

Basic Materials

EDEN
4.8%
OPPE
10.6%

Utilities

EDEN
3.9%
OPPE
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EDEN
2.0%
OPPE
3.1%

Technology

EDEN
1.1%
OPPE
7.2%

Energy

EDEN
1.1%
OPPE
9.1%

Communication Services

EDEN

-

OPPE
1.6%

Real Estate

EDEN

-

OPPE
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDEN vs. OPPE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDEN
EDEN Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
EDEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDEN Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
EDEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDEN Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

OPPE
OPPE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
OPPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPPE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
OPPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPPE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDEN vs. OPPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) and WisdomTree European Opportunities Fund (OPPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDENOPPEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.37

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.11

3.28

-3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.22

12.49

-12.72

EDEN vs. OPPE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the OPPE Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDEN and OPPE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDENOPPEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

2.09

-2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.91

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.72

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.65

-0.01

Drawdowns

EDEN vs. OPPE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDEN drawdown since its inception was -36.61%, smaller than the maximum OPPE drawdown of -39.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDEN and OPPE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDENOPPEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.61%

-39.28%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.17%

-8.83%

-12.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.31%

-15.04%

-14.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.61%

-24.49%

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.61%

-39.28%

+2.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.24%

-0.60%

-14.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-5.47%

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.04%

2.31%

+7.73%

Volatility

EDEN vs. OPPE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) is 4.88%, while WisdomTree European Opportunities Fund (OPPE) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that EDEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OPPE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDENOPPEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

5.49%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.61%

11.66%

+3.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.92%

13.86%

+7.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.21%

15.55%

+4.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.43%

17.17%

+2.26%

EDEN vs. OPPE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDEN has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than OPPE's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDEN vs. OPPE - Dividend Comparison

EDEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than OPPE's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
2.93%2.79%1.50%1.92%1.47%0.74%0.42%2.36%2.01%2.03%1.28%1.46%
OPPE
WisdomTree European Opportunities Fund
2.72%2.95%3.99%3.53%5.13%2.39%3.42%3.08%2.34%1.46%2.60%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDEN and OPPE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OPPE has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to EDEN (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDEN dropped -36.61% vs OPPE's -39.28%.

On 10-year performance, OPPE leads with 12.39% vs 8.04% for EDEN. On fees, EDEN is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, EDEN has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, OPPE has performed better with a 12.39% return vs 8.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EDEN is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for OPPE.

EDEN has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 2.72% for OPPE.

EDEN tracks MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index, while OPPE tracks WisdomTree European Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDEN and 0.58% for OPPE.

OPPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDEN and OPPE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer