EDEN vs. FCNTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EDEN (iShares MSCI Denmark ETF) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both funds - EDEN is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index, while FCNTX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, EDEN returned 8.04%/yr vs 17.43%/yr for FCNTX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDEN charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.

Performance

EDEN vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDEN achieves a -4.94% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, EDEN has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 8.04%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.43% annualized return.

EDEN

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -0.76%
• YTD: -4.94%
• 6M: -1.08%
• 1Y: -2.21%
• 3Y*: 2.62%
• 5Y*: 1.78%
• 10Y*: 8.04%

FCNTX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 3.65%
• YTD: 7.76%
• 6M: 10.05%
• 1Y: 23.72%
• 3Y*: 26.93%
• 5Y*: 15.12%
• 10Y*: 17.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDEN vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF	-4.94%	10.58%	-3.94%	17.99%	-11.47%	14.81%	42.56%	24.37%	-14.43%	35.39%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	7.76%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	32.48%	30.00%	-3.81%	32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EDEN and FCNTX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2012	0.56

The correlation between EDEN and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

EDEN vs. FCNTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EDEN	FCNTX
Healthcare	34.8%	9.2%
Industrials	31.3%	8.6%
Financial Services	16.2%	13.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	3.7%
Basic Materials	4.8%	2.1%
Utilities	3.9%	0.5%
Consumer Cyclical	2.0%	10.1%
Technology	1.1%	27.0%
Energy	1.1%	3.6%
Communication Services	-	21.2%
Real Estate	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

EDEN vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDEN

EDEN Risk / Return Rank: 7
EDEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
EDEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
EDEN Omega Ratio Rank: 7
EDEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
EDEN Martin Ratio Rank: 8

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 35
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDEN vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDEN	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.11	1.72	-1.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.00	2.39	-2.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.31	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.11	2.13	-2.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.22	9.04	-9.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EDEN vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDEN and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDEN	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11	1.72	-1.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	0.79	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.89	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.78	-0.14

Drawdowns

EDEN vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDEN drawdown since its inception was -36.61%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDEN and FCNTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDEN	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.61%	-49.19%	+12.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.17%	-11.30%	-9.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.31%	-19.75%	-9.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.61%	-32.59%	-4.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.61%	-32.59%	-4.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.24%	-0.53%	-14.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.36%	-8.16%	+0.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.04%	2.65%	+7.39%

Volatility

EDEN vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.26%. This indicates that EDEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDEN	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.88%	3.26%	+1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.61%	10.48%	+5.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.92%	14.03%	+6.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.21%	19.15%	+1.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.43%	19.68%	-0.25%

EDEN vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDEN has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDEN vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

EDEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF	2.93%	2.79%	1.50%	1.92%	1.47%	0.74%	0.42%	2.36%	2.01%	2.03%	1.28%	1.46%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	4.33%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDEN and FCNTX in my portfolio?

EDEN and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDEN or FCNTX?

EDEN has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to FCNTX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDEN dropped -36.61% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.