EDEN vs. EUSC
EDEN (iShares MSCI Denmark ETF) and EUSC (WisdomTree Europe Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund) are both Europe Equities funds - EDEN tracks the MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index while EUSC tracks the WisdomTree Europe Hedged SmallCap Equity Index. Both are passively managed. EDEN charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for EUSC.
Performance
EDEN vs. EUSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EDEN
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- -4.94%
- 6M
- -1.08%
- 1Y
- -2.21%
- 3Y*
- 2.62%
- 5Y*
- 1.78%
- 10Y*
- 8.04%
EUSC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDEN vs. EUSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | -3.19% |
EUSC WisdomTree Europe Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund | 0.00% |
EDEN vs. EUSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDEN
EUSC
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
EDEN
EUSC
Industrials
EDEN
EUSC
Financial Services
EDEN
EUSC
Consumer Defensive
EDEN
EUSC
Basic Materials
EDEN
EUSC
Utilities
EDEN
EUSC
Consumer Cyclical
EDEN
EUSC
Technology
EDEN
EUSC
Energy
EDEN
EUSC
Communication Services
EDEN
-
EUSC
Real Estate
EDEN
-
EUSC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDEN vs. EUSC — Risk / Return Rank
EDEN
EUSC
EDEN vs. EUSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) and WisdomTree Europe Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund (EUSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDEN | EUSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDEN | EUSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | — | — |
Drawdowns
EDEN vs. EUSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDEN drawdown since its inception was -36.61%, which is greater than EUSC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDEN and EUSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDEN | EUSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.61% | 0.00% | -36.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.24% | 0.00% | -15.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | 0.00% | -7.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.04% | — | — |
Volatility
EDEN vs. EUSC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDEN | EUSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.92% | 0.00% | +20.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 0.00% | +20.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 0.00% | +19.43% |
EDEN vs. EUSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDEN has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than EUSC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDEN vs. EUSC - Dividend Comparison
EDEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, while EUSC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | 2.93% | 2.79% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 1.47% | 0.74% | 0.42% | 2.36% | 2.01% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 1.46% |
EUSC WisdomTree Europe Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, EDEN is cheaper at 0.53% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDEN is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for EUSC.
EDEN has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 0.00% for EUSC.
EDEN tracks MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index, while EUSC tracks WisdomTree Europe Hedged SmallCap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDEN and 0.58% for EUSC.
Find the right allocation for EDEN and EUSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer