PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ED3F.DE vs. 5J50.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ED3F.DE vs. 5J50.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Global X Europe Focused Defence Tech UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (ED3F.DE) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (5J50.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ED3F.DE achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than 5J50.DE's 8.32% return.


ED3F.DE

1D
-0.14%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
16.69%
6M
4.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

5J50.DE

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
8.32%
6M
8.17%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ED3F.DE vs. 5J50.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ED3F.DE and 5J50.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2025

0.76

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ED3F.DE vs. 5J50.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Europe Focused Defence Tech UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (ED3F.DE) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (5J50.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ED3F.DE vs. 5J50.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ED3F.DE5J50.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

2.42

-1.58

Drawdowns

ED3F.DE vs. 5J50.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ED3F.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.72%, which is greater than 5J50.DE's maximum drawdown of -11.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ED3F.DE and 5J50.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ED3F.DE5J50.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.72%

-11.37%

-9.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.61%

-5.89%

-1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.11%

-2.68%

-4.43%

Volatility

ED3F.DE vs. 5J50.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ED3F.DE5J50.DEDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.14%

18.64%

+11.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.14%

18.64%

+11.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.14%

18.64%

+11.50%

ED3F.DE vs. 5J50.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ED3F.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than 5J50.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ED3F.DE vs. 5J50.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ED3F.DE nor 5J50.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments