PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ED3F.DE vs. DFNC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ED3F.DE vs. DFNC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Global X Europe Focused Defence Tech UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (ED3F.DE) and iShares Europe Defence UCITS ETF EUR Acc (DFNC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ED3F.DE achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than DFNC.DE's 15.40% return.


ED3F.DE

1D
-0.14%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
16.69%
6M
4.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFNC.DE

1D
2.00%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
15.40%
6M
5.38%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ED3F.DE vs. DFNC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ED3F.DE and DFNC.DE is 0.95 — these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2025

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ED3F.DE vs. DFNC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Europe Focused Defence Tech UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (ED3F.DE) and iShares Europe Defence UCITS ETF EUR Acc (DFNC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ED3F.DE vs. DFNC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ED3F.DEDFNC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.36

+0.47

Drawdowns

ED3F.DE vs. DFNC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ED3F.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.72%, roughly equal to the maximum DFNC.DE drawdown of -20.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ED3F.DE and DFNC.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ED3F.DEDFNC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.72%

-20.23%

-0.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.61%

-4.78%

-2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.11%

-6.96%

-0.15%

Volatility

ED3F.DE vs. DFNC.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ED3F.DEDFNC.DEDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.14%

29.81%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.14%

29.81%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.14%

29.81%

+0.33%

ED3F.DE vs. DFNC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ED3F.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DFNC.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ED3F.DE vs. DFNC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ED3F.DE nor DFNC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments