PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECOIX vs. FNARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECOIX vs. FNARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ecofin Global Renewables Infrastructure Fund (ECOIX) and Fidelity Natural Resources Fund (FNARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECOIX achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly lower than FNARX's 26.41% return.


ECOIX

1D
0.87%
1M
1.22%
YTD
10.15%
6M
8.17%
1Y
18.44%
3Y*
7.72%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*

FNARX

1D
1.53%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
26.41%
6M
25.73%
1Y
49.46%
3Y*
22.36%
5Y*
20.77%
10Y*
11.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECOIX vs. FNARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ECOIX
Ecofin Global Renewables Infrastructure Fund
10.15%25.37%-3.91%-8.55%-10.92%3.59%26.86%
FNARX
Fidelity Natural Resources Fund
26.41%28.67%3.76%6.41%41.01%39.34%7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ECOIX and FNARX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2020

0.35

The correlation between ECOIX and FNARX shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECOIX vs. FNARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECOIX
ECOIX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ECOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ECOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

FNARX
FNARX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FNARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNARX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FNARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNARX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECOIX vs. FNARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecofin Global Renewables Infrastructure Fund (ECOIX) and Fidelity Natural Resources Fund (FNARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ECOIXFNARXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.48

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

8.80

-6.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.75

23.35

-16.60

ECOIX vs. FNARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECOIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the FNARX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECOIX and FNARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ECOIXFNARXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

2.93

-1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.84

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.30

+0.06

Drawdowns

ECOIX vs. FNARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECOIX drawdown since its inception was -38.64%, smaller than the maximum FNARX drawdown of -71.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECOIX and FNARX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECOIXFNARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.64%

-71.04%

+32.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.11%

-5.74%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.02%

-20.64%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.60%

-29.93%

-7.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-3.04%

+2.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.80%

-20.05%

+5.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

2.16%

+0.65%

Volatility

ECOIX vs. FNARX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ecofin Global Renewables Infrastructure Fund (ECOIX) is 4.13%, while Fidelity Natural Resources Fund (FNARX) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that ECOIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECOIXFNARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

5.16%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.96%

14.12%

-4.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

17.31%

-4.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

24.99%

-7.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.39%

26.95%

-9.56%

ECOIX vs. FNARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECOIX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FNARX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

ECOIX vs. FNARX - Dividend Comparison

ECOIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than FNARX's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECOIX
Ecofin Global Renewables Infrastructure Fund
3.52%3.74%3.26%3.75%3.11%4.26%1.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNARX
Fidelity Natural Resources Fund
1.74%1.89%1.51%1.60%2.42%1.46%1.79%1.42%1.17%1.38%0.62%0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


ECOIX and FNARX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNARX has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to ECOIX (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECOIX dropped -38.64% vs FNARX's -71.04%.

FNARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECOIX and FNARX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer