ECO vs. XOM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM).

Performance

ECO vs. XOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ECO vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp	53.85%	71.94%	-11.70%	-1.51%
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation	41.92%	15.98%	11.26%	0.43%

Fundamentals

EPS ECO : $3.76 XOM : $10.37
PE Ratio ECO : 13.45 XOM : 16.35
PEG Ratio ECO : 1.27 XOM : 0.40
PS Ratio ECO : 4.22 XOM : 1.50
Total Revenue (TTM) ECO : $391.55M XOM : $327.29B
Gross Profit (TTM) ECO : $193.44M XOM : $81.32B
EBITDA (TTM) ECO : $207.57M XOM : $61.89B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECO achieves a 53.85% return, which is significantly higher than XOM's 41.92% return.

ECO

• 1D: 1.89%
• 1M: -3.68%
• YTD: 53.85%
• 6M: 81.60%
• 1Y: 150.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XOM

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: 11.25%
• YTD: 41.92%
• 6M: 52.80%
• 1Y: 47.56%
• 3Y*: 19.66%
• 5Y*: 29.06%
• 10Y*: 12.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ECO vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECO

ECO Risk / Return Rank: 96
ECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
ECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ECO Omega Ratio Rank: 93
ECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
ECO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

XOM

XOM Risk / Return Rank: 87
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 85
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECO vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ECO	XOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.52	1.92	+1.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.81	2.44	+1.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.33	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.18	3.06	+5.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	22.05	7.95	+14.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ECO vs. XOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECO Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is higher than the XOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECO and XOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ECO	XOM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.52	1.92	+1.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	0.49	+0.55

Correlation

The correlation between ECO and XOM is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ECO vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison

ECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than XOM's 2.38% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp	6.56%	6.26%	15.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation	2.38%	3.32%	3.57%	3.68%	3.22%	5.70%	8.44%	4.92%	4.74%	3.66%	3.30%	3.69%

Drawdowns

ECO vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECO drawdown since its inception was -46.15%, smaller than the maximum XOM drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECO and XOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECO	XOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.15%	-62.40%	+16.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.66%	-16.05%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.51%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.03%	-1.06%	-3.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.05%	-10.20%	-5.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.55%	6.17%	+0.38%

Volatility

ECO vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) has a higher volatility of 14.33% compared to Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) at 6.40%. This indicates that ECO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ECO	XOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.33%	6.40%	+7.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.83%	16.13%	+13.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.08%	24.86%	+18.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.16%	26.49%	+15.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.16%	27.88%	+14.28%

Financials

ECO vs. XOM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp and Exxon Mobil Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ECO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a gross profit of 82.70M and revenue of 126.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.2%.

XOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 26.20B and revenue of 83.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.4%.

ECO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported an operating income of 68.59M and revenue of 126.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.1%.

XOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 9.81B and revenue of 83.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

ECO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a net income of 59.46M and revenue of 126.85M, resulting in a net margin of 46.9%.

XOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 7.61B and revenue of 83.43B, resulting in a net margin of 9.1%.