PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECO vs. MU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ECO vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECO achieves a 73.56% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 243.32% return.


ECO

1D
5.19%
1M
10.41%
6M
54.36%
YTD
73.56%
1Y
156.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MU

1D
-1.24%
1M
-1.65%
6M
183.94%
YTD
243.32%
1Y
687.66%
3Y*
149.71%
5Y*
66.39%
10Y*
54.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECO vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ECO
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp
73.56%71.94%-11.70%-1.25%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
243.32%240.24%-0.96%16.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ECO and MU is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023

0.10

The correlation between ECO and MU shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ECO:

$1.80B

MU:

$1.11T

EPS

ECO:

$5.73

MU:

$44.42

PE Ratio

ECO:

9.59

MU:

22.05

PEG Ratio

ECO:

0.91

MU:

0.08

PS Ratio

ECO:

3.96

MU:

12.33

PB Ratio

ECO:

2.89

MU:

11.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

ECO:

$481.57M

MU:

$90.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ECO:

$274.61M

MU:

$65.51B

EBITDA (TTM)

ECO:

$284.05M

MU:

$44.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECO vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECO
ECO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECO vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECOMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.69

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.25

23.23

-13.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.78

83.25

-57.48

ECO vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECO Sharpe Ratio is 3.96, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 9.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECO and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECO vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECO drawdown since its inception was -46.15%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECO and MU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECOMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.15%

-98.25%

+52.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.66%

-30.28%

+12.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-19.29%

+16.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.89%

-58.07%

+43.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.33%

8.43%

-2.10%

Volatility

ECO vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) is 15.55%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 33.63%. This indicates that ECO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECOMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.55%

33.63%

-18.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.07%

62.19%

-31.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.32%

75.68%

-34.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.27%

54.75%

-12.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.27%

50.65%

-8.38%

Dividends

ECO vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

ECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.10%, more than MU's 0.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ECO
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp
9.10%6.26%15.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%

Financials

ECO vs. MU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
170.17M
41.46B
(ECO) Total Revenue
(MU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ECO vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
64.5%
84.6%
Portfolio components
ECO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a gross profit of 109.68M and revenue of 170.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.5%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.

ECO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported an operating income of 98.06M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.6%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.

ECO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a net income of 88.32M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in a net margin of 51.9%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ECO and MU have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (33.63%) compared to ECO (15.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECO dropped -46.15% vs MU's -98.25%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.29 vs 3.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECO and MU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer