PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECO vs. MTSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ECO vs. MTSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECO achieves a 65.79% return, which is significantly lower than MTSI's 128.52% return.


ECO

1D
2.84%
1M
0.83%
YTD
65.79%
6M
65.40%
1Y
148.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MTSI

1D
6.62%
1M
1.41%
YTD
128.52%
6M
124.41%
1Y
185.72%
3Y*
85.93%
5Y*
46.16%
10Y*
27.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECO vs. MTSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ECO
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp
65.79%71.94%-11.70%-1.25%
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
128.52%31.85%39.76%9.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ECO and MTSI is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ECO:

$2.00B

MTSI:

$30.19B

EPS

ECO:

$5.83

MTSI:

$2.33

PE Ratio

ECO:

9.00

MTSI:

168.14

PEG Ratio

ECO:

0.85

MTSI:

0.25

PS Ratio

ECO:

3.71

MTSI:

27.68

PB Ratio

ECO:

2.76

MTSI:

21.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

ECO:

$481.57M

MTSI:

$1.07B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ECO:

$274.61M

MTSI:

$594.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

ECO:

$284.05M

MTSI:

$245.21M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECO vs. MTSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECO
ECO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

MTSI
MTSI Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
MTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
MTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECO vs. MTSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECOMTSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.50

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.23

9.76

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.50

24.96

-1.46

ECO vs. MTSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECO Sharpe Ratio is 3.63, which is comparable to the MTSI Sharpe Ratio of 3.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECO and MTSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECO vs. MTSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECO drawdown since its inception was -46.15%, smaller than the maximum MTSI drawdown of -80.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECO and MTSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECOMTSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.15%

-80.78%

+34.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.66%

-19.74%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-4.46%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.08%

-26.18%

+11.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.23%

7.70%

-1.47%

Volatility

ECO vs. MTSI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) is 12.35%, while MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) has a volatility of 20.95%. This indicates that ECO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECOMTSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.35%

20.95%

-8.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.55%

40.71%

-10.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.08%

51.36%

-11.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.87%

43.84%

-1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.87%

52.45%

-10.58%

Dividends

ECO vs. MTSI - Dividend Comparison

ECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.53%, while MTSI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
ECO
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp
9.53%6.26%15.57%
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ECO vs. MTSI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
170.17M
288.96M
(ECO) Total Revenue
(MTSI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ECO vs. MTSI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
64.5%
56.9%
Portfolio components
ECO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a gross profit of 109.68M and revenue of 170.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.5%.

MTSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 164.43M and revenue of 288.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.9%.

ECO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported an operating income of 98.06M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.6%.

MTSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.83M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

ECO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a net income of 88.32M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in a net margin of 51.9%.

MTSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 46.33M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ECO and MTSI have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTSI has higher volatility (20.95%) compared to ECO (12.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECO dropped -46.15% vs MTSI's -80.78%.

MTSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.75 vs 3.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECO and MTSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer