PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECMPA.AS vs. LBS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ECMPA.AS vs. LBS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Eurocommercial Properties N.V. (ECMPA.AS) and Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ECMPA.AS is traded in EUR, while LBS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the LBS.TO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECMPA.AS achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than LBS.TO's 28.19% return. Over the past 10 years, ECMPA.AS has underperformed LBS.TO with an annualized return of 2.60%, while LBS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.45% annualized return.


ECMPA.AS

1D
-0.34%
1M
0.93%
YTD
9.51%
6M
9.09%
1Y
10.02%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
2.60%

LBS.TO

1D
1.52%
1M
5.98%
YTD
28.19%
6M
38.30%
1Y
88.79%
3Y*
37.18%
5Y*
23.98%
10Y*
20.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECMPA.AS vs. LBS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ECMPA.AS
Eurocommercial Properties N.V.
9.51%26.23%7.72%5.59%28.63%33.86%-38.48%0.47%-20.30%5.59%
LBS.TO
Life & Banc Split Corp.
28.19%52.37%30.39%4.93%-3.64%72.92%-10.75%49.01%-25.92%8.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ECMPA.AS and LBS.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2009

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECMPA.AS vs. LBS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECMPA.AS
ECMPA.AS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ECMPA.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECMPA.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECMPA.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ECMPA.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECMPA.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

LBS.TO
LBS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LBS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECMPA.AS vs. LBS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eurocommercial Properties N.V. (ECMPA.AS) and Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ECMPA.ASLBS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.76

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

6.91

-6.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.56

33.05

-31.49

ECMPA.AS vs. LBS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECMPA.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the LBS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECMPA.AS and LBS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ECMPA.ASLBS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

4.31

-3.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.93

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

0.53

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.52

-0.25

Drawdowns

ECMPA.AS vs. LBS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECMPA.AS drawdown since its inception was -76.29%, which is greater than LBS.TO's maximum drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECMPA.AS and LBS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECMPA.ASLBS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.29%

-65.81%

-10.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.25%

-12.92%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.26%

-34.99%

+19.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.49%

-42.53%

+16.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.27%

-65.81%

-10.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.78%

-0.06%

-4.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.57%

-12.02%

-1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.37%

2.70%

+3.67%

Volatility

ECMPA.AS vs. LBS.TO - Volatility Comparison

Eurocommercial Properties N.V. (ECMPA.AS) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) at 4.35%. This indicates that ECMPA.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LBS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECMPA.ASLBS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

4.35%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.65%

17.22%

-3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.65%

20.71%

-3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.11%

25.84%

-0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.04%

39.15%

-7.11%

Dividends

ECMPA.AS vs. LBS.TO - Dividend Comparison

ECMPA.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.07%, more than LBS.TO's 8.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECMPA.AS
Eurocommercial Properties N.V.
11.07%6.91%7.66%7.21%6.73%2.62%0.00%9.20%8.41%6.10%5.91%5.25%
LBS.TO
Life & Banc Split Corp.
8.10%9.34%13.29%15.23%13.89%11.89%5.56%15.06%17.96%12.05%12.35%14.91%

Financials

ECMPA.AS vs. LBS.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eurocommercial Properties N.V. and Life & Banc Split Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. ECMPA.AS values in EUR, LBS.TO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


ECMPA.AS and LBS.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECMPA.AS and LBS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer