ECLM.DE vs. XDEB.DE
ECLM.DE (HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF) and XDEB.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds - ECLM.DE tracks the iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers while XDEB.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ECLM.DE returned -0.34%/yr vs 6.21%/yr for XDEB.DE. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ECLM.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEB.DE.
Performance
ECLM.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECLM.DE achieves a 18.15% return, which is significantly higher than XDEB.DE's 1.74% return.
ECLM.DE
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 5.70%
- YTD
- 18.15%
- 6M
- 17.28%
- 1Y
- 37.06%
- 3Y*
- 4.30%
- 5Y*
- -0.34%
- 10Y*
- —
XDEB.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- -0.08%
- 3Y*
- 6.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 6.88%
ECLM.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECLM.DE HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF | 18.15% | 12.83% | -11.47% | 1.02% | -23.37% | 14.89% | 7.80% |
XDEB.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C | 1.74% | -1.27% | 17.83% | 3.66% | -4.06% | 24.01% | 0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECLM.DE and XDEB.DE is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2020 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ECLM.DE and XDEB.DE has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECLM.DE vs. XDEB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ECLM.DE
XDEB.DE
ECLM.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF (ECLM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECLM.DE | XDEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.00 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | -0.02 | +1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.63 | -0.03 | +3.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECLM.DE | XDEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | -0.01 | +1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.61 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.70 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
ECLM.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECLM.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.88%, which is greater than XDEB.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECLM.DE and XDEB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECLM.DE | XDEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.88% | -28.57% | -21.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.77% | -5.31% | -14.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.17% | -13.02% | -23.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.88% | -13.02% | -36.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.23% | -6.53% | -9.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.19% | -5.03% | -19.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.19% | 2.37% | +7.82% |
Volatility
ECLM.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Volatility Comparison
HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF (ECLM.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) at 2.63%. This indicates that ECLM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECLM.DE | XDEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 2.63% | +3.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.35% | 5.56% | +7.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.64% | 7.86% | +20.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.04% | 10.16% | +12.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.35% | 12.03% | +11.32% |
ECLM.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECLM.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEB.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECLM.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ECLM.DE nor XDEB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ECLM.DE and XDEB.DE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEB.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEB.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ECLM.DE.
ECLM.DE tracks iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers, while XDEB.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ECLM.DE and 0.25% for XDEB.DE.
Find the right allocation for ECLM.DE and XDEB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer