ECL vs. FTV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ecolab Inc. (ECL) and Fortive Corporation (FTV).

Performance

ECL vs. FTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ecolab Inc. (ECL) and Fortive Corporation (FTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ECL vs. FTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ECL Ecolab Inc.	1.60%	13.19%	19.29%	37.94%	-37.10%	9.38%	13.17%	32.26%	11.07%	15.80%
FTV Fortive Corporation	0.24%	-1.77%	2.28%	15.08%	-15.41%	8.14%	11.23%	13.33%	-6.14%	35.49%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ECL : $75.60B FTV : $17.66B
EPS ECL : $7.28 FTV : $1.75
PE Ratio ECL : 36.53 FTV : 31.64
PEG Ratio ECL : 1.93 FTV : 8.07
PS Ratio ECL : 4.71 FTV : 3.56
PB Ratio ECL : 7.74 FTV : 2.74
Total Revenue (TTM) ECL : $16.08B FTV : $5.14B
Gross Profit (TTM) ECL : $5.31B FTV : $3.13B
EBITDA (TTM) ECL : $3.30B FTV : $1.17B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECL achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly higher than FTV's 0.24% return.

ECL

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: -13.50%
• YTD: 1.60%
• 6M: -2.33%
• 1Y: 6.02%
• 3Y*: 18.37%
• 5Y*: 5.33%
• 10Y*: 10.18%

FTV

• 1D: 3.10%
• 1M: -6.52%
• YTD: 0.24%
• 6M: 13.09%
• 1Y: 0.80%
• 3Y*: 2.95%
• 5Y*: 1.13%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ECL vs. FTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECL

ECL Risk / Return Rank: 50
ECL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
ECL Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ECL Omega Ratio Rank: 43
ECL Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
ECL Martin Ratio Rank: 56

FTV

FTV Risk / Return Rank: 41
FTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
FTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FTV Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
FTV Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECL vs. FTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecolab Inc. (ECL) and Fortive Corporation (FTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ECL	FTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	0.03	+0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.53	0.26	+0.27
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.03	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.47	0.09	+0.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.35	0.17	+1.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ECL vs. FTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECL Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is higher than the FTV Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECL and FTV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ECL	FTV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29	0.03	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	0.05	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.25	+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between ECL and FTV is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ECL vs. FTV - Dividend Comparison

ECL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than FTV's 0.53% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECL Ecolab Inc.	1.04%	1.02%	1.01%	1.09%	1.42%	0.83%	0.87%	0.96%	1.15%	1.13%	1.21%	1.17%
FTV Fortive Corporation	0.53%	0.53%	0.43%	0.39%	0.44%	0.37%	0.35%	0.37%	0.41%	0.39%	0.26%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ECL vs. FTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECL drawdown since its inception was -47.19%, smaller than the maximum FTV drawdown of -52.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECL and FTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECL	FTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.19%	-52.65%	+5.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.60%	-16.76%	+0.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.70%	-32.10%	-11.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.50%	-14.15%	+0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.94%	-11.41%	+3.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.71%	9.04%	-3.33%

Volatility

ECL vs. FTV - Volatility Comparison

Ecolab Inc. (ECL) and Fortive Corporation (FTV) have volatilities of 6.93% and 7.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ECL	FTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.93%	7.02%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.11%	20.04%	-4.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.00%	30.03%	-9.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.69%	25.05%	-1.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.84%	26.55%	-1.71%

Financials

ECL vs. FTV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ecolab Inc. and Fortive Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ECL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ecolab Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FTV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fortive Corporation reported a gross profit of 708.90M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.2%.

ECL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ecolab Inc. reported an operating income of 680.50M and revenue of 4.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.

FTV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fortive Corporation reported an operating income of 225.50M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.

ECL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ecolab Inc. reported a net income of 563.90M and revenue of 4.20B, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.

FTV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fortive Corporation reported a net income of 185.70M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.