ECL vs. FTV
ECL (Ecolab Inc.) and FTV (Fortive Corporation) are both stocks. ECL operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while FTV operates in Scientific & Technical Instruments (Technology). Over the past 5 years, ECL returned 4.52%/yr vs 2.55%/yr for FTV. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ECL vs. FTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECL achieves a -2.86% return, which is significantly lower than FTV's 11.46% return.
ECL
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- -2.86%
- 6M
- -3.29%
- 1Y
- -3.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.52%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
FTV
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 11.46%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 13.93%
- 3Y*
- 7.30%
- 5Y*
- 2.55%
- 10Y*
- —
ECL vs. FTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECL Ecolab Inc. | -2.86% | 13.19% | 19.29% | 37.94% | -37.10% | 9.38% | 13.17% | 32.26% | 11.07% | 15.80% |
FTV Fortive Corporation | 11.46% | -1.77% | 2.28% | 15.08% | -15.41% | 8.14% | 11.23% | 13.33% | -6.14% | 35.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECL and FTV is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2016 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ECL and FTV has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
ECL:
$72.15B
FTV:
$19.23B
ECL:
$7.40
FTV:
$1.66
ECL:
34.38
FTV:
36.95
ECL:
1.82
FTV:
9.42
ECL:
4.40
FTV:
4.24
ECL:
7.21
FTV:
3.16
ECL:
$16.45B
FTV:
$4.74B
ECL:
$7.29B
FTV:
$2.93B
ECL:
$3.28B
FTV:
$1.11B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECL vs. FTV — Risk / Return Rank
ECL
FTV
ECL vs. FTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecolab Inc. (ECL) and Fortive Corporation (FTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECL | FTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.12 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 0.90 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.45 | 1.78 | -2.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECL | FTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 | 0.55 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.10 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.28 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
ECL vs. FTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECL drawdown since its inception was -47.19%, smaller than the maximum FTV drawdown of -52.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECL and FTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECL | FTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.19% | -52.65% | +5.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.09% | -15.62% | -4.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.09% | -28.03% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.70% | -32.10% | -11.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.30% | -4.54% | -12.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.98% | -11.33% | +3.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.45% | 7.84% | +0.61% |
Volatility
ECL vs. FTV - Volatility Comparison
Ecolab Inc. (ECL) has a higher volatility of 6.90% compared to Fortive Corporation (FTV) at 5.17%. This indicates that ECL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECL | FTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.90% | 5.17% | +1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.58% | 20.38% | -4.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.46% | 25.64% | -5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.81% | 25.03% | -1.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.98% | 26.47% | -1.49% |
Dividends
ECL vs. FTV - Dividend Comparison
ECL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than FTV's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECL Ecolab Inc. | 1.09% | 1.02% | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.42% | 0.83% | 0.87% | 0.96% | 1.15% | 1.13% | 1.21% | 1.17% |
FTV Fortive Corporation | 0.37% | 0.53% | 0.43% | 0.39% | 0.44% | 0.37% | 0.35% | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.39% | 0.26% | 0.00% |
Financials
ECL vs. FTV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ecolab Inc. and Fortive Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ECL vs. FTV - Profitability Comparison
ECL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ecolab Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.77B and revenue of 4.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.6%.
FTV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortive Corporation reported a gross profit of 675.50M and revenue of 1.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.2%.
ECL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ecolab Inc. reported an operating income of 622.00M and revenue of 4.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.
FTV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortive Corporation reported an operating income of 191.70M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.
ECL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ecolab Inc. reported a net income of 432.60M and revenue of 4.07B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.
FTV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortive Corporation reported a net income of 136.40M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ECL and FTV have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECL has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to FTV (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECL dropped -47.19% vs FTV's -52.65%.
FTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECL and FTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer