PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTV vs. XYL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FTV vs. XYL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fortive Corporation (FTV) and Xylem Inc. (XYL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTV achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly higher than XYL's -10.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FTV has underperformed XYL with an annualized return of 7.25%, while XYL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.28% annualized return.


FTV

1D
0.18%
1M
3.71%
6M
12.48%
YTD
13.09%
1Y
18.91%
3Y*
4.17%
5Y*
3.62%
10Y*
7.25%

XYL

1D
-0.01%
1M
10.11%
6M
-12.21%
YTD
-10.34%
1Y
-6.24%
3Y*
4.73%
5Y*
1.25%
10Y*
11.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTV vs. XYL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTV
Fortive Corporation
13.09%-1.77%2.28%15.08%-15.41%8.14%11.23%13.33%-6.14%35.49%
XYL
Xylem Inc.
-10.34%18.78%2.57%4.77%-6.60%18.94%30.90%19.59%-1.01%39.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FTV and XYL is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2016

0.64

The correlation between FTV and XYL shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.64 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FTV:

$19.00B

XYL:

$28.81B

EPS

FTV:

$1.69

XYL:

$4.02

PE Ratio

FTV:

36.89

XYL:

30.13

PEG Ratio

FTV:

9.41

XYL:

1.90

PS Ratio

FTV:

4.23

XYL:

4.24

PB Ratio

FTV:

3.20

XYL:

2.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

FTV:

$4.74B

XYL:

$6.97B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FTV:

$2.93B

XYL:

$2.71B

EBITDA (TTM)

FTV:

$1.11B

XYL:

$1.41B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTV vs. XYL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTV
FTV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

XYL
XYL Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
XYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYL Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYL Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTV vs. XYL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortive Corporation (FTV) and Xylem Inc. (XYL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTVXYLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.98

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

-0.21

+1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.45

-0.42

+3.86

FTV vs. XYL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTV Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the XYL Sharpe Ratio of -0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTV and XYL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTV vs. XYL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTV drawdown since its inception was -52.65%, which is greater than XYL's maximum drawdown of -46.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTV and XYL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTVXYLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.65%

-46.69%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.31%

-30.04%

+16.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.03%

-30.04%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.10%

-46.69%

+14.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.65%

-46.69%

-5.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.14%

-19.95%

+16.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.26%

-10.46%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.85%

15.01%

-9.16%

Volatility

FTV vs. XYL - Volatility Comparison

Fortive Corporation (FTV) and Xylem Inc. (XYL) have volatilities of 5.97% and 6.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTVXYLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

6.18%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.79%

19.95%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.08%

25.03%

+1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.18%

26.16%

-0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.42%

27.29%

-0.87%

Dividends

FTV vs. XYL - Dividend Comparison

FTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than XYL's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTV
Fortive Corporation
0.47%0.53%0.43%0.39%0.44%0.37%0.35%0.37%0.41%0.39%0.26%0.00%
XYL
Xylem Inc.
1.37%1.17%1.24%1.15%1.09%0.93%1.02%1.22%1.26%1.06%1.25%1.54%

Financials

FTV vs. XYL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortive Corporation and Xylem Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
1.07B
0
(FTV) Total Revenue
(XYL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FTV and XYL have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XYL has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to FTV (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTV dropped -52.65% vs XYL's -46.69%.

FTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTV and XYL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer