ECHX vs. LABU
ECHX (Leverage Shares 2X Long EchoStar Daily ETF) and LABU (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. ECHX is actively managed, while LABU is passively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ECHX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for LABU.
Performance
ECHX vs. LABU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ECHX
- 1D
- 9.89%
- 1M
- -26.88%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
LABU
- 1D
- 6.80%
- 1M
- 28.60%
- 6M
- 56.58%
- YTD
- 66.91%
- 1Y
- 332.58%
- 3Y*
- 29.63%
- 5Y*
- -26.04%
- 10Y*
- -9.42%
- ALL TIME*
- -19.54%
ECHX vs. LABU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ECHX Leverage Shares 2X Long EchoStar Daily ETF | -49.13% |
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 46.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECHX and LABU is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2026 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECHX vs. LABU — Risk / Return Rank
ECHX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LABU
ECHX vs. LABU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long EchoStar Daily ETF (ECHX) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ECHX | LABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.44 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 10.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 29.77 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ECHX vs. LABU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECHX drawdown since its inception was -53.71%, smaller than the maximum LABU drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECHX and LABU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECHX | LABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.71% | -99.18% | +45.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -30.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -78.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -97.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.13% | -94.12% | +44.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.96% | -81.80% | +47.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.23% | — |
Volatility
ECHX vs. LABU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECHX | LABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 25.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 63.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 126.48% | 79.49% | +46.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 126.48% | 96.11% | +30.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 126.48% | 95.24% | +31.24% |
ECHX vs. LABU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECHX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LABU's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECHX vs. LABU - Dividend Comparison
ECHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECHX Leverage Shares 2X Long EchoStar Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 0.38% | 0.84% | 0.35% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.64% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECHX and LABU have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ECHX is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ECHX is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for LABU.
LABU has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for ECHX.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ECHX and 0.96% for LABU.
Find the right allocation for ECHX and LABU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer