PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECH vs. VLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECH vs. VLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) and Valero Energy Corporation (VLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECH achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly lower than VLO's 46.74% return. Over the past 10 years, ECH has underperformed VLO with an annualized return of 4.44%, while VLO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.94% annualized return.


ECH

1D
-0.85%
1M
1.75%
YTD
2.23%
6M
5.27%
1Y
36.61%
3Y*
14.33%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
4.44%

VLO

1D
-1.45%
1M
-6.44%
YTD
46.74%
6M
46.81%
1Y
73.82%
3Y*
31.15%
5Y*
29.68%
10Y*
20.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECH vs. VLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ECH
iShares MSCI Chile ETF
2.23%65.41%-8.67%9.01%25.12%-19.80%-7.13%-17.79%-18.98%41.79%
VLO
Valero Energy Corporation
46.74%36.97%-2.96%5.86%74.95%40.25%-35.69%30.27%-15.73%38.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ECH and VLO is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2007

0.32

The correlation between ECH and VLO shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECH vs. VLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECH
ECH Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ECH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECH Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
ECH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECH Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

VLO
VLO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
VLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECH vs. VLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) and Valero Energy Corporation (VLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECHVLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

5.23

-3.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.41

12.85

-8.44

ECH vs. VLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECH Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the VLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECH and VLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECH vs. VLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECH drawdown since its inception was -74.08%, smaller than the maximum VLO drawdown of -87.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECH and VLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECHVLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.08%

-87.50%

+13.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.74%

-14.19%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.59%

-41.22%

+15.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.59%

-41.22%

+15.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.89%

-71.88%

+4.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.03%

-9.62%

-14.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.48%

-34.24%

-3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.33%

5.76%

+2.57%

Volatility

ECH vs. VLO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) is 9.09%, while Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that ECH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECHVLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.09%

10.17%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.20%

27.59%

-6.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.51%

35.09%

-9.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.63%

36.94%

-9.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.27%

40.39%

-13.12%

Dividends

ECH vs. VLO - Dividend Comparison

ECH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than VLO's 1.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECH
iShares MSCI Chile ETF
1.93%2.01%3.12%4.77%6.73%5.49%2.16%2.47%2.37%1.42%1.85%2.13%
VLO
Valero Energy Corporation
1.97%2.78%3.49%3.14%3.09%5.22%6.93%3.84%4.27%2.34%3.51%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


ECH and VLO have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VLO has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to ECH (9.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECH dropped -74.08% vs VLO's -87.50%.

VLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECH and VLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer