ECH vs. JEPQ

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

ECH (iShares MSCI Chile ETF) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ECH is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Chile Investable Market Index, while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ECH returned 14.33%/yr vs 20.83%/yr for JEPQ. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ECH charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.

Performance

ECH vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECH achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ's 10.52% return.

ECH

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 1.75%
• YTD: 2.23%
• 6M: 5.27%
• 1Y: 36.61%
• 3Y*: 14.33%
• 5Y*: 12.22%
• 10Y*: 4.44%

JEPQ

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: 3.22%
• YTD: 10.52%
• 6M: 10.65%
• 1Y: 29.09%
• 3Y*: 20.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECH vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ECH iShares MSCI Chile ETF	2.23%	65.41%	-8.67%	9.01%	12.94%
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	10.52%	15.18%	24.85%	36.28%	-11.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ECH and JEPQ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022	0.41

The correlation between ECH and JEPQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ECH vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ECH	JEPQ
Financial Services	21.8%	0.3%
Basic Materials	20.1%	0.9%
Industrials	15.7%	2.8%
Utilities	12.9%	1.1%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	11.8%
Real Estate	7.7%	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	6.0%
Communication Services	1.7%	13.9%
Energy	-	0.3%
Healthcare	-	3.9%
Technology	-	58.9%

Return for Risk

ECH vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECH

ECH Risk / Return Rank: 39
ECH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
ECH Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
ECH Omega Ratio Rank: 39
ECH Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
ECH Martin Ratio Rank: 32

JEPQ

JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 76
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 81
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECH vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ECH	JEPQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	2.28	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	3.02	-1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.45	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	3.31	-1.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.41	15.77	-11.36

ECH vs. JEPQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECH Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the JEPQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECH and JEPQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ECH vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECH drawdown since its inception was -74.08%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECH and JEPQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECH	JEPQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.08%	-20.07%	-54.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.74%	-8.82%	-10.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.59%	-20.07%	-5.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.03%	0.00%	-24.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.48%	-3.40%	-34.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.33%	1.85%	+6.48%

Volatility

ECH vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 5.70%. This indicates that ECH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ECH	JEPQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.09%	5.70%	+3.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.20%	10.49%	+10.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.51%	12.83%	+12.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.63%	16.76%	+10.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.27%	16.76%	+10.51%

ECH vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECH has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ECH vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison

ECH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than JEPQ's 9.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECH iShares MSCI Chile ETF	1.93%	2.01%	3.12%	4.77%	6.73%	5.49%	2.16%	2.47%	2.37%	1.42%	1.85%	2.13%
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	9.98%	10.53%	9.65%	10.03%	9.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ECH and JEPQ in my portfolio?

ECH and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ECH or JEPQ?

ECH has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to JEPQ (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECH dropped -74.08% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.

Which ETF is better, ECH or JEPQ?

On 3-year performance, JEPQ leads with 20.83% vs 14.33% for ECH. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ECH or JEPQ?

Over the 3-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 20.83% return vs 14.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ECH or JEPQ?

JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ECH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ECH or JEPQ?

JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.98%, compared with 1.93% for ECH.

What is the main difference between ECH and JEPQ?

ECH is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. ECH tracks MSCI Chile Investable Market Index, while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ECH and 0.35% for JEPQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.