ECFHX vs. XPTFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ECFHX (Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund) and XPTFX (Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund) are both Bank Loan funds. Over the past 5 years, ECFHX returned 3.37%/yr vs 6.40%/yr for XPTFX. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ECFHX charges 1.77%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for XPTFX.

Performance

ECFHX vs. XPTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund (ECFHX) and Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund (XPTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECFHX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than XPTFX's 2.83% return.

ECFHX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 0.47%
• 6M: 0.60%
• 1Y: 2.78%
• 3Y*: 5.31%
• 5Y*: 3.37%
• 10Y*: 3.58%

XPTFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 2.83%
• 6M: 3.46%
• 1Y: 7.55%
• 3Y*: 8.05%
• 5Y*: 6.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECFHX vs. XPTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ECFHX Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund	0.47%	3.54%	6.21%	9.73%	-4.11%	3.71%	1.79%	7.01%	-0.77%	2.99%
XPTFX Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund	2.83%	7.47%	8.62%	8.55%	3.74%	1.91%	2.18%	4.70%	4.47%	-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ECFHX and XPTFX is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017	0.05

The correlation between ECFHX and XPTFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ECFHX vs. XPTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECFHX

ECFHX Risk / Return Rank: 29
ECFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
ECFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
ECFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
ECFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
ECFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

XPTFX

XPTFX Risk / Return Rank: 80
XPTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
XPTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
XPTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
XPTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
XPTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECFHX vs. XPTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund (ECFHX) and Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund (XPTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ECFHX	XPTFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	2.58	-1.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	3.73	-1.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	4.27	-2.89
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.50	3.87	-2.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.10	12.16	-7.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ECFHX vs. XPTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECFHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the XPTFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECFHX and XPTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ECFHX	XPTFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	2.58	-1.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.24	2.55	-1.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.99	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.07	2.36	-1.29

Drawdowns

ECFHX vs. XPTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECFHX drawdown since its inception was -34.41%, which is greater than XPTFX's maximum drawdown of -2.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECFHX and XPTFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECFHX	XPTFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.41%	-2.95%	-31.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.86%	-1.96%	+0.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.98%	-2.95%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.24%	-2.95%	-4.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.77%	-0.26%	-1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	0.62%	-0.07%

Volatility

ECFHX vs. XPTFX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund (ECFHX) has a higher volatility of 0.51% compared to Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund (XPTFX) at 0.21%. This indicates that ECFHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XPTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ECFHX	XPTFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.51%	0.21%	+0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.55%	2.89%	-1.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13%	2.94%	-0.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.74%	2.52%	+0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.62%	2.02%	+1.60%

ECFHX vs. XPTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECFHX has a 1.77% expense ratio, which is higher than XPTFX's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

ECFHX vs. XPTFX - Dividend Comparison

ECFHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, less than XPTFX's 6.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECFHX Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund	5.95%	6.36%	6.38%	5.62%	4.02%	2.48%	2.92%	4.08%	3.64%	3.09%	3.39%	3.54%
XPTFX Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund	6.04%	7.24%	6.78%	6.66%	5.70%	2.21%	2.74%	4.62%	4.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ECFHX and XPTFX in my portfolio?

ECFHX and XPTFX have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ECFHX or XPTFX?

ECFHX has higher volatility (0.51%) compared to XPTFX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECFHX dropped -34.41% vs XPTFX's -2.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XPTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.