PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECAR.L vs. XSTC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECAR.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ECAR.L is traded in USD, while XSTC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSTC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECAR.L achieves a 57.85% return, which is significantly higher than XSTC.L's 23.02% return.


ECAR.L

1D
-1.93%
1M
20.58%
YTD
57.85%
6M
59.03%
1Y
91.94%
3Y*
27.13%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*

XSTC.L

1D
-2.08%
1M
13.80%
YTD
23.02%
6M
22.95%
1Y
51.90%
3Y*
34.02%
5Y*
22.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECAR.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ECAR.L
iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
57.85%24.33%-0.93%27.09%-27.28%16.16%33.68%5.26%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
23.02%22.94%37.18%56.67%-30.82%32.26%45.87%30.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ECAR.L and XSTC.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2019

0.70

The correlation between ECAR.L and XSTC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

ECAR.L vs. XSTC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ECAR.L
XSTC.L

Technology

66.1%
99.6%

Consumer Cyclical

28.6%

-

Industrials

4.8%
0.2%

Basic Materials

0.2%

-

Communication Services

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

ECAR.L
66.1%
XSTC.L
99.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ECAR.L
28.6%
XSTC.L

-

Industrials

ECAR.L
4.8%
XSTC.L
0.2%

Basic Materials

ECAR.L
0.2%
XSTC.L

-

Communication Services

ECAR.L

-

XSTC.L
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

ECAR.L

-

XSTC.L

-

Energy

ECAR.L

-

XSTC.L
0.1%

Financial Services

ECAR.L

-

XSTC.L
0.1%

Healthcare

ECAR.L

-

XSTC.L

-

Real Estate

ECAR.L

-

XSTC.L

-

Utilities

ECAR.L

-

XSTC.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECAR.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECAR.L
ECAR.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ECAR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECAR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECAR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ECAR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECAR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

XSTC.L
XSTC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECAR.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ECAR.LXSTC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.42

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.02

2.95

+4.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.74

8.80

+12.94

ECAR.L vs. XSTC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECAR.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.53, which is higher than the XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECAR.L and XSTC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ECAR.LXSTC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53

2.57

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.97

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.06

-0.44

Drawdowns

ECAR.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECAR.L drawdown since its inception was -42.77%, which is greater than XSTC.L's maximum drawdown of -35.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECAR.L and XSTC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECAR.LXSTC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.77%

-35.20%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.03%

-17.54%

+4.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.34%

-27.66%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.21%

-35.20%

-1.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-3.01%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.56%

-7.34%

-4.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

5.88%

-1.67%

Volatility

ECAR.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) has a higher volatility of 12.68% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) at 7.06%. This indicates that ECAR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECAR.LXSTC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.68%

7.06%

+5.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.36%

15.16%

+6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.91%

20.09%

+5.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.72%

23.50%

+1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.69%

23.43%

+2.26%

ECAR.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECAR.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

ECAR.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison

ECAR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
ECAR.L
iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
0.26%0.33%0.37%0.53%1.08%0.53%0.63%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


ECAR.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ECAR.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ECAR.L and 0.12% for XSTC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECAR.L and XSTC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer