ECAR.L vs. VPNG.L
ECAR.L (iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and VPNG.L (Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Technology Equities funds - ECAR.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while VPNG.L tracks the Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ECAR.L returned 27.13%/yr vs 35.21%/yr for VPNG.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ECAR.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for VPNG.L.
Performance
ECAR.L vs. VPNG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ECAR.L is traded in USD, while VPNG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VPNG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECAR.L achieves a 57.85% return, which is significantly higher than VPNG.L's 50.41% return.
ECAR.L
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- 20.58%
- YTD
- 57.85%
- 6M
- 59.03%
- 1Y
- 91.94%
- 3Y*
- 27.13%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- —
VPNG.L
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 9.18%
- YTD
- 50.41%
- 6M
- 52.48%
- 1Y
- 80.26%
- 3Y*
- 35.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ECAR.L vs. VPNG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECAR.L iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 57.85% | 24.33% | -0.93% | 27.09% | -27.28% | -0.58% |
VPNG.L Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 50.41% | 29.76% | 13.28% | 17.15% | -30.25% | 3.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECAR.L and VPNG.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021 | 0.64 |
The correlation between ECAR.L and VPNG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECAR.L vs. VPNG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ECAR.L
VPNG.L
ECAR.L vs. VPNG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) and Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VPNG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECAR.L | VPNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.55 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.02 | 5.64 | +1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.74 | 19.02 | +2.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECAR.L | VPNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53 | 3.41 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.66 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
ECAR.L vs. VPNG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECAR.L drawdown since its inception was -42.77%, which is greater than VPNG.L's maximum drawdown of -38.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECAR.L and VPNG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECAR.L | VPNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.77% | -38.84% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.03% | -14.17% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.34% | -25.68% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.93% | -1.89% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.56% | -14.89% | +3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 4.20% | +0.01% |
Volatility
ECAR.L vs. VPNG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) has a higher volatility of 12.68% compared to Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VPNG.L) at 7.46%. This indicates that ECAR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPNG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECAR.L | VPNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.68% | 7.46% | +5.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.36% | 17.70% | +3.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.91% | 23.53% | +2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 22.79% | +1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.69% | 22.79% | +2.90% |
ECAR.L vs. VPNG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECAR.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than VPNG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECAR.L vs. VPNG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ECAR.L nor VPNG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ECAR.L and VPNG.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ECAR.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ECAR.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VPNG.L.
ECAR.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while VPNG.L tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ECAR.L and 0.50% for VPNG.L.
Find the right allocation for ECAR.L and VPNG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer