PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECAR.L vs. SWRD.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECAR.L vs. SWRD.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ECAR.L is traded in USD, while SWRD.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SWRD.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECAR.L achieves a 57.85% return, which is significantly higher than SWRD.AS's 9.79% return.


ECAR.L

1D
-1.93%
1M
20.58%
YTD
57.85%
6M
59.03%
1Y
91.94%
3Y*
27.13%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*

SWRD.AS

1D
0.08%
1M
4.08%
YTD
9.79%
6M
11.08%
1Y
26.03%
3Y*
20.89%
5Y*
11.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECAR.L vs. SWRD.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ECAR.L
iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
57.85%24.33%-0.93%27.09%-27.28%16.16%33.68%4.66%
SWRD.AS
SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF
9.79%21.71%19.46%23.93%-18.56%23.56%15.43%14.37%

Correlation

The correlation between ECAR.L and SWRD.AS is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2019

0.78

The correlation between ECAR.L and SWRD.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECAR.L vs. SWRD.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECAR.L
ECAR.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ECAR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECAR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECAR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ECAR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECAR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SWRD.AS
SWRD.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SWRD.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWRD.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWRD.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SWRD.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWRD.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECAR.L vs. SWRD.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ECAR.LSWRD.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.40

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.02

3.03

+3.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.74

13.22

+8.53

ECAR.L vs. SWRD.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECAR.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.53, which is higher than the SWRD.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECAR.L and SWRD.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ECAR.LSWRD.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53

2.21

+1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.76

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.82

-0.20

Drawdowns

ECAR.L vs. SWRD.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECAR.L drawdown since its inception was -42.77%, which is greater than SWRD.AS's maximum drawdown of -34.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECAR.L and SWRD.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECAR.LSWRD.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.77%

-34.09%

-8.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.03%

-8.48%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.34%

-17.76%

-11.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.21%

-25.68%

-10.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-0.50%

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.56%

-5.04%

-6.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

1.96%

+2.25%

Volatility

ECAR.L vs. SWRD.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) has a higher volatility of 12.68% compared to SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.AS) at 2.96%. This indicates that ECAR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWRD.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECAR.LSWRD.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.68%

2.96%

+9.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.36%

8.62%

+12.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.91%

11.62%

+14.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.72%

15.44%

+9.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.69%

17.05%

+8.64%

ECAR.L vs. SWRD.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECAR.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SWRD.AS's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

ECAR.L vs. SWRD.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither ECAR.L nor SWRD.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ECAR.L and SWRD.AS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SWRD.AS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SWRD.AS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ECAR.L.

ECAR.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while SWRD.AS is Global Equities. ECAR.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while SWRD.AS tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ECAR.L and 0.12% for SWRD.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECAR.L and SWRD.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer