ECAR.L vs. HTWD.L
ECAR.L (iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and HTWD.L (HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - ECAR.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while HTWD.L tracks the HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ECAR.L returned 10.77%/yr vs 20.24%/yr for HTWD.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ECAR.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HTWD.L.
Performance
ECAR.L vs. HTWD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECAR.L achieves a 38.96% return, which is significantly lower than HTWD.L's 57.53% return.
ECAR.L
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -11.13%
- 6M
- 34.95%
- YTD
- 38.96%
- 1Y
- 56.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.50%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- —
HTWD.L
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -6.47%
- 6M
- 50.40%
- YTD
- 57.53%
- 1Y
- 84.50%
- 3Y*
- 40.11%
- 5Y*
- 20.24%
- 10Y*
- 20.62%
ECAR.L vs. HTWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECAR.L iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 38.96% | 24.27% | -0.92% | 27.13% | -27.28% | 16.16% | 33.68% | 6.58% |
HTWD.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF | 57.53% | 32.26% | 25.40% | 28.98% | -29.41% | 27.78% | 36.62% | 30.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECAR.L and HTWD.L is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2019 | 0.71 |
The correlation between ECAR.L and HTWD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECAR.L vs. HTWD.L — Risk / Return Rank
ECAR.L
HTWD.L
ECAR.L vs. HTWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) and HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF (HTWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ECAR.L | HTWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.49 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | 7.40 | -3.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.64 | 20.03 | -9.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ECAR.L vs. HTWD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECAR.L drawdown since its inception was -42.77%, roughly equal to the maximum HTWD.L drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECAR.L and HTWD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECAR.L | HTWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.77% | -41.06% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.58% | -11.22% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.31% | -28.22% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.21% | -41.06% | +4.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.65% | -10.43% | -3.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.50% | -9.65% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.30% | 4.16% | +1.14% |
Volatility
ECAR.L vs. HTWD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) is 10.14%, while HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF (HTWD.L) has a volatility of 10.99%. This indicates that ECAR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECAR.L | HTWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.14% | 10.99% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.01% | 23.75% | +1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.66% | 27.32% | +1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.39% | 23.58% | +1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.96% | 21.64% | +4.32% |
ECAR.L vs. HTWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECAR.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HTWD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECAR.L vs. HTWD.L - Dividend Comparison
ECAR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECAR.L iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTWD.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF | 1.04% | 1.53% | 1.18% | 2.73% | 3.31% | 1.13% | 1.69% | 2.08% | 2.79% | 1.37% | 2.64% | 2.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECAR.L and HTWD.L have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ECAR.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ECAR.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HTWD.L.
ECAR.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while HTWD.L tracks HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ECAR.L and 0.50% for HTWD.L.
Find the right allocation for ECAR.L and HTWD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer