ECAR.L vs. DGIT.L
ECAR.L (iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and DGIT.L (iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc) are both Technology Equities funds from iShares tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ECAR.L returned 10.79%/yr vs -1.10%/yr for DGIT.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
ECAR.L vs. DGIT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ECAR.L is traded in USD, while DGIT.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the DGIT.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECAR.L achieves a 45.44% return, which is significantly higher than DGIT.L's -3.45% return.
ECAR.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- 45.44%
- 6M
- 44.97%
- 1Y
- 71.04%
- 3Y*
- 23.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.79%
- 10Y*
- —
DGIT.L
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- -3.45%
- 6M
- -3.81%
- 1Y
- -7.32%
- 3Y*
- 12.52%
- 5Y*
- -1.10%
- 10Y*
- —
ECAR.L vs. DGIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECAR.L iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 45.44% | 24.27% | -0.92% | 27.13% | -27.28% | 16.16% | 33.68% | 6.58% |
DGIT.L iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc | -3.45% | 4.89% | 21.96% | 32.15% | -36.43% | 1.12% | 41.50% | 10.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECAR.L and DGIT.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2019 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ECAR.L and DGIT.L has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ECAR.L vs. DGIT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ECAR.L
DGIT.L
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
ECAR.L
DGIT.L
Consumer Cyclical
ECAR.L
DGIT.L
Industrials
ECAR.L
DGIT.L
Basic Materials
ECAR.L
DGIT.L
-
Communication Services
ECAR.L
-
DGIT.L
Consumer Defensive
ECAR.L
-
DGIT.L
Energy
ECAR.L
-
DGIT.L
-
Financial Services
ECAR.L
-
DGIT.L
Healthcare
ECAR.L
-
DGIT.L
Real Estate
ECAR.L
-
DGIT.L
Utilities
ECAR.L
-
DGIT.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECAR.L vs. DGIT.L — Risk / Return Rank
ECAR.L
DGIT.L
ECAR.L vs. DGIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) and iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc (DGIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ECAR.L | DGIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.95 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.43 | -0.31 | +5.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.54 | -0.68 | +16.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ECAR.L vs. DGIT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECAR.L drawdown since its inception was -42.77%, smaller than the maximum DGIT.L drawdown of -46.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECAR.L and DGIT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECAR.L | DGIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.77% | -46.83% | +4.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.02% | -23.91% | +10.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.31% | -23.91% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.21% | -46.83% | +10.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.63% | -11.41% | +1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.50% | -15.39% | +3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.56% | 10.82% | -6.26% |
Volatility
ECAR.L vs. DGIT.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) has a higher volatility of 12.19% compared to iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc (DGIT.L) at 6.36%. This indicates that ECAR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECAR.L | DGIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.19% | 6.36% | +5.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.91% | 14.28% | +9.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.84% | 17.37% | +10.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.22% | 25.21% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 23.96% | +1.95% |
ECAR.L vs. DGIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ECAR.L and DGIT.L have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
ECAR.L vs. DGIT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ECAR.L nor DGIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ECAR.L and DGIT.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ECAR.L and DGIT.L have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD.
Find the right allocation for ECAR.L and DGIT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer