PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECAR.L vs. DGIT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECAR.L vs. DGIT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) and iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc (DGIT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ECAR.L is traded in USD, while DGIT.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the DGIT.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECAR.L achieves a 45.44% return, which is significantly higher than DGIT.L's -3.45% return.


ECAR.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
45.44%
6M
44.97%
1Y
71.04%
3Y*
23.07%
5Y*
10.79%
10Y*

DGIT.L

1D
-0.84%
1M
-2.00%
YTD
-3.45%
6M
-3.81%
1Y
-7.32%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
-1.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECAR.L vs. DGIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ECAR.L
iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
45.44%24.27%-0.92%27.13%-27.28%16.16%33.68%6.58%
DGIT.L
iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc
-3.45%4.89%21.96%32.15%-36.43%1.12%41.50%10.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ECAR.L and DGIT.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2019

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between ECAR.L and DGIT.L has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ECAR.L vs. DGIT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ECAR.L
DGIT.L

Technology

66.1%
42.9%

Consumer Cyclical

28.3%
16.0%

Industrials

5.0%
10.1%

Basic Materials

0.1%

-

Communication Services

-

19.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

5.5%

Healthcare

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

5.8%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

ECAR.L
66.1%
DGIT.L
42.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ECAR.L
28.3%
DGIT.L
16.0%

Industrials

ECAR.L
5.0%
DGIT.L
10.1%

Basic Materials

ECAR.L
0.1%
DGIT.L

-

Communication Services

ECAR.L

-

DGIT.L
19.6%

Consumer Defensive

ECAR.L

-

DGIT.L
0.0%

Energy

ECAR.L

-

DGIT.L

-

Financial Services

ECAR.L

-

DGIT.L
5.5%

Healthcare

ECAR.L

-

DGIT.L
0.1%

Real Estate

ECAR.L

-

DGIT.L
5.8%

Utilities

ECAR.L

-

DGIT.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECAR.L vs. DGIT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECAR.L
ECAR.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ECAR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECAR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECAR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ECAR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECAR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

DGIT.L
DGIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
DGIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
DGIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECAR.L vs. DGIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) and iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc (DGIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECAR.LDGIT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

0.95

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.43

-0.31

+5.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.54

-0.68

+16.22

ECAR.L vs. DGIT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECAR.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the DGIT.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECAR.L and DGIT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECAR.L vs. DGIT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECAR.L drawdown since its inception was -42.77%, smaller than the maximum DGIT.L drawdown of -46.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECAR.L and DGIT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECAR.LDGIT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.77%

-46.83%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.02%

-23.91%

+10.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.31%

-23.91%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.21%

-46.83%

+10.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.63%

-11.41%

+1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.50%

-15.39%

+3.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.56%

10.82%

-6.26%

Volatility

ECAR.L vs. DGIT.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) has a higher volatility of 12.19% compared to iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc (DGIT.L) at 6.36%. This indicates that ECAR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECAR.LDGIT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.19%

6.36%

+5.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.91%

14.28%

+9.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.84%

17.37%

+10.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.22%

25.21%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.91%

23.96%

+1.95%

ECAR.L vs. DGIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ECAR.L and DGIT.L have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

ECAR.L vs. DGIT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ECAR.L nor DGIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ECAR.L and DGIT.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ECAR.L and DGIT.L have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECAR.L and DGIT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer