ECAR.L vs. BATT.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ECAR.L (iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and BATT.L (L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ECAR.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while BATT.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ECAR.L returned 12.46%/yr vs 16.19%/yr for BATT.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ECAR.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for BATT.L.

Performance

ECAR.L vs. BATT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECAR.L achieves a 57.85% return, which is significantly higher than BATT.L's 35.17% return.

ECAR.L

• 1D: -1.93%
• 1M: 20.58%
• YTD: 57.85%
• 6M: 59.03%
• 1Y: 91.94%
• 3Y*: 27.13%
• 5Y*: 12.46%
• 10Y*: —

BATT.L

• 1D: -2.55%
• 1M: -1.49%
• YTD: 35.17%
• 6M: 40.03%
• 1Y: 128.07%
• 3Y*: 28.19%
• 5Y*: 16.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECAR.L vs. BATT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ECAR.L iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	57.85%	24.33%	-0.93%	27.09%	-27.28%	16.16%	33.68%	5.26%
BATT.L L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF	35.17%	71.43%	-1.20%	8.80%	-14.18%	15.68%	81.32%	7.33%

Correlation

The correlation between ECAR.L and BATT.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2019	0.85

The correlation between ECAR.L and BATT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ECAR.L vs. BATT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ECAR.L	BATT.L
Technology	66.1%	11.8%
Consumer Cyclical	28.6%	15.0%
Industrials	4.8%	33.3%
Basic Materials	0.2%	36.9%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	3.0%

Return for Risk

ECAR.L vs. BATT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECAR.L

ECAR.L Risk / Return Rank: 92
ECAR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ECAR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ECAR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ECAR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ECAR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 91

BATT.L

BATT.L Risk / Return Rank: 95
BATT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
BATT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
BATT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 92
BATT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BATT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECAR.L vs. BATT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ECAR.L	BATT.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.53	4.24	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.60	4.61	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.62	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.02	8.95	-1.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.74	30.19	-8.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ECAR.L vs. BATT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECAR.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.53, which is comparable to the BATT.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECAR.L and BATT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ECAR.L	BATT.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.53	4.24	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.63	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.71	-0.09

Drawdowns

ECAR.L vs. BATT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECAR.L drawdown since its inception was -42.77%, which is greater than BATT.L's maximum drawdown of -39.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECAR.L and BATT.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECAR.L	BATT.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.77%	-39.70%	-3.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.03%	-14.23%	+1.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.34%	-33.90%	+4.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.21%	-33.90%	-2.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.93%	-5.46%	+3.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.56%	-12.01%	+0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.21%	4.23%	-0.02%

Volatility

ECAR.L vs. BATT.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) has a higher volatility of 12.68% compared to L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L) at 11.35%. This indicates that ECAR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BATT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ECAR.L	BATT.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.68%	11.35%	+1.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.36%	23.92%	-2.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.91%	30.01%	-4.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.72%	25.51%	-0.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.69%	25.15%	+0.54%

ECAR.L vs. BATT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECAR.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BATT.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

ECAR.L vs. BATT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ECAR.L nor BATT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ECAR.L and BATT.L in my portfolio?

ECAR.L and BATT.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ECAR.L or BATT.L?

On fees, ECAR.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ECAR.L or BATT.L?

ECAR.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BATT.L.

What is the main difference between ECAR.L and BATT.L?

ECAR.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while BATT.L is Alternative Energy Equities. ECAR.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while BATT.L tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ECAR.L and 0.49% for BATT.L.