ECAR.L vs. ARKI.L
ECAR.L (iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and ARKI.L (ARK Artificial Intelligence & Robotics UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation) are both Technology Equities funds. ECAR.L is passively managed, while ARKI.L is actively managed. Over the past year, ECAR.L returned 91.94% vs 43.84% for ARKI.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ECAR.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKI.L.
Performance
ECAR.L vs. ARKI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECAR.L achieves a 57.85% return, which is significantly higher than ARKI.L's 13.70% return.
ECAR.L
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- 20.58%
- YTD
- 57.85%
- 6M
- 59.03%
- 1Y
- 91.94%
- 3Y*
- 27.13%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- —
ARKI.L
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 9.84%
- YTD
- 13.70%
- 6M
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 43.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ECAR.L vs. ARKI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ECAR.L iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 57.85% | 24.33% | 4.30% |
ARKI.L ARK Artificial Intelligence & Robotics UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation | 13.70% | 38.42% | 58.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECAR.L and ARKI.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between ECAR.L and ARKI.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECAR.L vs. ARKI.L — Risk / Return Rank
ECAR.L
ARKI.L
ECAR.L vs. ARKI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) and ARK Artificial Intelligence & Robotics UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (ARKI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECAR.L | ARKI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.26 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.02 | 1.81 | +5.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.74 | 4.67 | +17.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECAR.L | ARKI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53 | 1.55 | +1.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 1.74 | -1.12 |
Drawdowns
ECAR.L vs. ARKI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECAR.L drawdown since its inception was -42.77%, which is greater than ARKI.L's maximum drawdown of -30.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECAR.L and ARKI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECAR.L | ARKI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.77% | -30.97% | -11.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.03% | -24.05% | +11.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.93% | -2.18% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.56% | -6.45% | -5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 9.35% | -5.14% |
Volatility
ECAR.L vs. ARKI.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) has a higher volatility of 12.68% compared to ARK Artificial Intelligence & Robotics UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (ARKI.L) at 8.69%. This indicates that ECAR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECAR.L | ARKI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.68% | 8.69% | +3.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.36% | 19.68% | +1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.91% | 28.20% | -2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 30.91% | -6.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.69% | 30.91% | -5.22% |
ECAR.L vs. ARKI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECAR.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKI.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECAR.L vs. ARKI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ECAR.L nor ARKI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ECAR.L and ARKI.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ECAR.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ECAR.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKI.L.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ECAR.L and 0.75% for ARKI.L.
Find the right allocation for ECAR.L and ARKI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer