EBUY.L vs. XFSN.L
EBUY.L (Amundi MSCI Digital Economy and Metaverse ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and XFSN.L (Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from Amundi and DWS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EBUY.L returned 23.05%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for XFSN.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EBUY.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XFSN.L.
Performance
EBUY.L vs. XFSN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBUY.L achieves a 19.97% return, which is significantly higher than XFSN.L's -2.90% return.
EBUY.L
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 11.34%
- YTD
- 19.97%
- 6M
- 17.94%
- 1Y
- 35.28%
- 3Y*
- 23.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.68%
- 10Y*
- —
XFSN.L
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 5.60%
- YTD
- -2.90%
- 6M
- -4.80%
- 1Y
- -1.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EBUY.L vs. XFSN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBUY.L Amundi MSCI Digital Economy and Metaverse ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 19.97% | 9.88% | 27.49% | 29.53% | -11.71% |
XFSN.L Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C | -2.90% | 2.93% | 34.89% | 21.37% | -7.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between EBUY.L and XFSN.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2022 | 0.90 |
The correlation between EBUY.L and XFSN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EBUY.L vs. XFSN.L — Risk / Return Rank
EBUY.L
XFSN.L
EBUY.L vs. XFSN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Digital Economy and Metaverse ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (EBUY.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBUY.L | XFSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.00 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | -0.06 | +1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.22 | -0.13 | +4.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBUY.L | XFSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | -0.10 | +2.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.61 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
EBUY.L vs. XFSN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBUY.L drawdown since its inception was -39.97%, which is greater than XFSN.L's maximum drawdown of -23.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBUY.L and XFSN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBUY.L | XFSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.97% | -23.96% | -16.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.87% | -23.96% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.63% | -23.96% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -11.60% | +10.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.27% | -6.19% | -9.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.33% | 11.38% | -3.05% |
Volatility
EBUY.L vs. XFSN.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Digital Economy and Metaverse ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (EBUY.L) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L) at 4.10%. This indicates that EBUY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XFSN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EBUY.L | XFSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 4.10% | +1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.63% | 11.66% | +1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.57% | 15.56% | +2.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 18.54% | +2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.81% | 18.54% | +3.27% |
EBUY.L vs. XFSN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBUY.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XFSN.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
EBUY.L vs. XFSN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EBUY.L nor XFSN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EBUY.L and XFSN.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XFSN.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XFSN.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EBUY.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EBUY.L and 0.35% for XFSN.L.
Find the right allocation for EBUY.L and XFSN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer