EBUY.L vs. 500U.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI Digital Economy and Metaverse ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (EBUY.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L).
EBUY.L and 500U.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EBUY.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Apr 20, 2020. 500U.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2021. Both EBUY.L and 500U.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EBUY.L vs. 500U.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EBUY.L vs. 500U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBUY.L Amundi MSCI Digital Economy and Metaverse ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | -9.61% | 9.88% | 27.49% | 29.53% | -31.73% | 4.85% | 51.00% |
500U.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc | -2.50% | 9.90% | 26.63% | 20.51% | -9.65% | 31.37% | 19.99% |
Different Trading Currencies
EBUY.L is traded in GBP, while 500U.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 500U.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBUY.L achieves a -9.61% return, which is significantly lower than 500U.L's -2.50% return.
EBUY.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- -9.61%
- 6M
- -12.63%
- 1Y
- 7.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- 3.10%
- 10Y*
- —
500U.L
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- -2.50%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- 1Y
- 15.56%
- 3Y*
- 15.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.85%
- 10Y*
- 15.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EBUY.L vs. 500U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBUY.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than 500U.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EBUY.L vs. 500U.L — Risk / Return Rank
EBUY.L
500U.L
EBUY.L vs. 500U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Digital Economy and Metaverse ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (EBUY.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBUY.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 0.99 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.68 | 1.43 | -0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.20 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 2.93 | -2.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.80 | 9.81 | -8.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBUY.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 0.99 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.85 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 1.26 | -0.80 |
Correlation
The correlation between EBUY.L and 500U.L is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EBUY.L vs. 500U.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EBUY.L nor 500U.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
EBUY.L vs. 500U.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBUY.L drawdown since its inception was -39.97%, which is greater than 500U.L's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBUY.L and 500U.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBUY.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.97% | -34.04% | -5.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.87% | -8.34% | -12.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.97% | -24.22% | -15.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.96% | -5.62% | -11.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.57% | -4.81% | -10.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.87% | 1.89% | +5.98% |
Volatility
EBUY.L vs. 500U.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Digital Economy and Metaverse ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (EBUY.L) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) at 4.54%. This indicates that EBUY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 500U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EBUY.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 4.54% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.29% | 9.04% | +4.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.04% | 15.63% | +4.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 15.26% | +6.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.80% | 18.72% | +3.08% |