EBUF vs. ZJUN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EBUF (Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) and ZJUN (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EBUF returned 16.13% vs 6.37% for ZJUN. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EBUF charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ZJUN.

Performance

EBUF vs. ZJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June (ZJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBUF achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly higher than ZJUN's 2.35% return.

EBUF

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: 9.96%
• 6M: 11.41%
• 1Y: 16.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZJUN

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 2.35%
• 6M: 2.85%
• 1Y: 6.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBUF vs. ZJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EBUF Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	9.96%	6.03%
ZJUN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June	2.35%	3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between EBUF and ZJUN is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025	0.51

The correlation between EBUF and ZJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EBUF vs. ZJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBUF

EBUF Risk / Return Rank: 94
EBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
EBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 96

ZJUN

ZJUN Risk / Return Rank: 95
ZJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ZJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ZJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 97
ZJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ZJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBUF vs. ZJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June (ZJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EBUF	ZJUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.92	3.50	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.94	5.86	-0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.73	1.83	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.90	5.95	+2.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	36.42	39.09	-2.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EBUF vs. ZJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBUF Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the ZJUN Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBUF and ZJUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EBUF	ZJUN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.92	3.50	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.94	3.47	-1.53

Drawdowns

EBUF vs. ZJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBUF drawdown since its inception was -6.49%, which is greater than ZJUN's maximum drawdown of -1.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBUF and ZJUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBUF	ZJUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.49%	-1.08%	-5.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.82%	-1.08%	-0.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-0.07%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.49%	-0.08%	-0.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.44%	0.16%	+0.28%

Volatility

EBUF vs. ZJUN - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF) has a higher volatility of 1.69% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June (ZJUN) at 0.29%. This indicates that EBUF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EBUF	ZJUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.69%	0.29%	+1.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.72%	1.46%	+3.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.55%	1.83%	+3.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.65%	1.84%	+4.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.65%	1.84%	+4.81%

EBUF vs. ZJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBUF has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than ZJUN's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

EBUF vs. ZJUN - Dividend Comparison

Neither EBUF nor ZJUN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EBUF and ZJUN in my portfolio?

EBUF and ZJUN have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EBUF or ZJUN?

EBUF has higher volatility (1.69%) compared to ZJUN (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBUF dropped -6.49% vs ZJUN's -1.08%.

Which ETF is better, EBUF or ZJUN?

On 1-year performance, EBUF leads with 16.13% vs 6.37% for ZJUN. On fees, ZJUN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, ZJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EBUF or ZJUN?

Over the 1-year period, EBUF has performed better with a 16.13% return vs 6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EBUF or ZJUN?

ZJUN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EBUF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EBUF or ZJUN?

EBUF and ZJUN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EBUF and ZJUN?

Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EBUF and 0.79% for ZJUN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 2.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.