EBUF vs. ZAPR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EBUF (Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) and ZAPR (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EBUF returned 16.34% vs 6.96% for ZAPR. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EBUF charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ZAPR.

Performance

EBUF vs. ZAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April (ZAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBUF achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly higher than ZAPR's 3.14% return.

EBUF

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 1.58%
• YTD: 10.75%
• 6M: 11.89%
• 1Y: 16.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZAPR

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 3.14%
• 6M: 3.18%
• 1Y: 6.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBUF vs. ZAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EBUF Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	10.75%	8.31%
ZAPR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April	3.14%	5.31%

Correlation

The correlation between EBUF and ZAPR is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025	0.50

The correlation between EBUF and ZAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EBUF vs. ZAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBUF

EBUF Risk / Return Rank: 94
EBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
EBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 96

ZAPR

ZAPR Risk / Return Rank: 98
ZAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ZAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ZAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ZAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ZAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBUF vs. ZAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April (ZAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EBUF	ZAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.87	4.74	-1.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.72	8.64	-3.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.70	2.24	-0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.01	17.39	-8.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	35.61	80.28	-44.67

EBUF vs. ZAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBUF Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is lower than the ZAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBUF and ZAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EBUF vs. ZAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBUF drawdown since its inception was -6.49%, which is greater than ZAPR's maximum drawdown of -1.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBUF and ZAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBUF	ZAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.49%	-1.72%	-4.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.82%	-0.40%	-1.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.17%	+0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.49%	-0.09%	-0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.46%	0.09%	+0.37%

Volatility

EBUF vs. ZAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF) has a higher volatility of 1.95% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April (ZAPR) at 0.51%. This indicates that EBUF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EBUF	ZAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.95%	0.51%	+1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.84%	1.10%	+3.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.74%	1.48%	+4.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.66%	2.49%	+4.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.66%	2.49%	+4.17%

EBUF vs. ZAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBUF has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than ZAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

EBUF vs. ZAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither EBUF nor ZAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EBUF and ZAPR in my portfolio?

EBUF and ZAPR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EBUF or ZAPR?

EBUF has higher volatility (1.95%) compared to ZAPR (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBUF dropped -6.49% vs ZAPR's -1.72%.

Which ETF is better, EBUF or ZAPR?

On 1-year performance, EBUF leads with 16.34% vs 6.96% for ZAPR. On fees, ZAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, ZAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EBUF or ZAPR?

Over the 1-year period, EBUF has performed better with a 16.34% return vs 6.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EBUF or ZAPR?

ZAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EBUF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EBUF or ZAPR?

EBUF and ZAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EBUF and ZAPR?

Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EBUF and 0.79% for ZAPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.74 vs 2.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.