PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EBUF vs. KJAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EBUF vs. KJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January (KJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EBUF vs. KJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBUF achieves a 2.98% return, which is significantly higher than KJAN's 1.38% return.


EBUF

1D
-0.48%
1M
1.29%
YTD
2.98%
6M
4.90%
1Y
12.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KJAN

1D
0.35%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
1.38%
6M
3.20%
1Y
20.99%
3Y*
10.92%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EBUF vs. KJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBUF has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than KJAN's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EBUF vs. KJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBUF
EBUF Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

KJAN
KJAN Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
KJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
KJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
KJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
KJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBUF vs. KJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January (KJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EBUFKJANDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.54

1.17

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.39

1.73

+0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.23

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.96

-0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.14

8.29

+5.85

EBUF vs. KJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBUF Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the KJAN Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBUF and KJAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EBUFKJANDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.17

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

0.49

+1.04

Correlation

The correlation between EBUF and KJAN is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EBUF vs. KJAN - Dividend Comparison

Neither EBUF nor KJAN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

EBUF vs. KJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBUF drawdown since its inception was -6.49%, smaller than the maximum KJAN drawdown of -28.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBUF and KJAN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EBUFKJANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.49%

-28.94%

+22.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.28%

-5.42%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-2.78%

+2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.53%

-4.21%

+3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

2.07%

-1.25%

Volatility

EBUF vs. KJAN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF) is 3.05%, while Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January (KJAN) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that EBUF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EBUFKJANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

4.14%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.47%

8.66%

-4.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.57%

14.03%

-6.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.57%

13.04%

-6.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.57%

15.58%

-9.01%