PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EBSAX vs. PCBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EBSAX vs. PCBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares (EBSAX) and BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund (PCBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBSAX achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly lower than PCBAX's 10.12% return.


EBSAX

1D
0.70%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
9.09%
6M
9.68%
1Y
4.91%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*

PCBAX

1D
0.53%
1M
2.34%
YTD
10.12%
6M
10.97%
1Y
13.18%
3Y*
10.05%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*
5.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBSAX vs. PCBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EBSAX
Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares
9.09%-1.34%11.28%-2.11%30.56%8.90%4.88%
PCBAX
BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund
10.12%6.16%11.77%2.37%5.77%0.29%3.26%

Correlation

The correlation between EBSAX and PCBAX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EBSAX vs. PCBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBSAX
EBSAX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
EBSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
EBSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

PCBAX
PCBAX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PCBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PCBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBSAX vs. PCBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares (EBSAX) and BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund (PCBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EBSAXPCBAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

2.41

-1.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.03

3.61

-2.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.47

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

4.66

-3.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.96

11.30

-9.34

EBSAX vs. PCBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBSAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the PCBAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBSAX and PCBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EBSAXPCBAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

2.41

-1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

1.08

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.58

+0.53

Drawdowns

EBSAX vs. PCBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBSAX drawdown since its inception was -11.15%, smaller than the maximum PCBAX drawdown of -39.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBSAX and PCBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EBSAXPCBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-39.55%

+28.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.83%

-3.04%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.26%

-6.75%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.15%

-6.75%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-0.06%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.16%

-4.37%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

1.25%

+1.42%

Volatility

EBSAX vs. PCBAX - Volatility Comparison

Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares (EBSAX) has a higher volatility of 1.89% compared to BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund (PCBAX) at 1.68%. This indicates that EBSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EBSAXPCBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.89%

1.68%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.95%

4.81%

+1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.16%

5.81%

+2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.59%

6.47%

+3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.47%

6.14%

+3.33%

EBSAX vs. PCBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBSAX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PCBAX's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

EBSAX vs. PCBAX - Dividend Comparison

EBSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, while PCBAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EBSAX
Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares
2.75%3.00%2.59%1.45%15.15%7.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PCBAX
BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.67%3.36%0.00%2.44%3.08%9.91%0.80%1.41%4.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


EBSAX and PCBAX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EBSAX has higher volatility (1.89%) compared to PCBAX (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBSAX dropped -11.15% vs PCBAX's -39.55%.

PCBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EBSAX and PCBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer