EBSAX vs. EGRAX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EBSAX (Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares) and EGRAX (Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund Class A) are both Macro Trading funds. Over the past 5 years, EBSAX returned 8.22%/yr vs 8.38%/yr for EGRAX. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EBSAX charges 2.00%/yr vs 2.22%/yr for EGRAX.

Performance

EBSAX vs. EGRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares (EBSAX) and Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund Class A (EGRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBSAX achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly higher than EGRAX's 6.45% return.

EBSAX

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -0.59%
• YTD: 9.09%
• 6M: 9.68%
• 1Y: 4.91%
• 3Y*: 3.96%
• 5Y*: 8.22%
• 10Y*: —

EGRAX

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 6.45%
• 6M: 8.09%
• 1Y: 19.27%
• 3Y*: 13.23%
• 5Y*: 8.38%
• 10Y*: 6.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBSAX vs. EGRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EBSAX Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares	9.09%	-1.34%	11.28%	-2.11%	30.56%	8.90%	4.88%
EGRAX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund Class A	6.45%	20.06%	9.19%	8.10%	-2.30%	3.35%	3.29%

Correlation

The correlation between EBSAX and EGRAX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020	0.10

The correlation between EBSAX and EGRAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (3 years) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EBSAX vs. EGRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBSAX

EBSAX Risk / Return Rank: 8
EBSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
EBSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
EBSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
EBSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
EBSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

EGRAX

EGRAX Risk / Return Rank: 97
EGRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
EGRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
EGRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
EGRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
EGRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBSAX vs. EGRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares (EBSAX) and Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund Class A (EGRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EBSAX	EGRAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.68	5.41	-4.73
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.03	7.78	-6.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	2.45	-1.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.90	5.66	-4.76
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.96	19.93	-17.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EBSAX vs. EGRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBSAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the EGRAX Sharpe Ratio of 5.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBSAX and EGRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EBSAX	EGRAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68	5.41	-4.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	2.10	-1.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.12	1.24	-0.13

Drawdowns

EBSAX vs. EGRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBSAX drawdown since its inception was -11.15%, smaller than the maximum EGRAX drawdown of -14.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBSAX and EGRAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBSAX	EGRAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.15%	-14.15%	+3.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.83%	-3.35%	-2.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.26%	-3.35%	-6.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.15%	-10.31%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-14.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.37%	-0.33%	-1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.16%	-1.93%	-1.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	0.95%	+1.72%

Volatility

EBSAX vs. EGRAX - Volatility Comparison

Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares (EBSAX) has a higher volatility of 1.89% compared to Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund Class A (EGRAX) at 0.86%. This indicates that EBSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EGRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EBSAX	EGRAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.89%	0.86%	+1.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.95%	3.19%	+2.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.16%	3.56%	+4.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.59%	4.01%	+5.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.47%	3.95%	+5.52%

EBSAX vs. EGRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBSAX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is lower than EGRAX's 2.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

EBSAX vs. EGRAX - Dividend Comparison

EBSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than EGRAX's 6.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EBSAX Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares	2.75%	3.00%	2.59%	1.45%	15.15%	7.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EGRAX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund Class A	6.35%	6.76%	5.86%	3.18%	4.53%	4.58%	5.61%	4.02%	0.00%	2.82%	1.47%	6.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EBSAX and EGRAX in my portfolio?

EBSAX and EGRAX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EBSAX or EGRAX?

EBSAX has higher volatility (1.89%) compared to EGRAX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBSAX dropped -11.15% vs EGRAX's -14.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EGRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.41 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.