PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EBND vs. VEMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EBND vs. VEMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBND achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than VEMY's 5.65% return.


EBND

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.29%
6M
-0.48%
YTD
0.87%
1Y
5.00%
3Y*
5.35%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
1.42%
ALL TIME*
1.04%

VEMY

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.85%
6M
3.07%
YTD
5.65%
1Y
12.83%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.14M$5.71M$6.29M
$966.52K$884.39K$876.68K

EBND vs. VEMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EBND
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF
0.87%15.83%-2.70%9.02%1.68%
VEMY
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
5.65%15.27%13.48%14.45%-1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between EBND and VEMY is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2022

0.59

The correlation between EBND and VEMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EBND vs. VEMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EBND
EBND Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
EBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBND Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
EBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

VEMY
VEMY Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
VEMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EBND vs. VEMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EBNDVEMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.43

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

3.23

-2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.62

14.88

-12.26

EBND vs. VEMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBND Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the VEMY Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBND and VEMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EBND vs. VEMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBND drawdown since its inception was -29.51%, which is greater than VEMY's maximum drawdown of -8.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBND and VEMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EBNDVEMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.51%

-8.77%

-20.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.63%

-4.00%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.31%

-6.57%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-1.07%

-1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.78%

-1.27%

-9.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

0.87%

+1.39%

Volatility

EBND vs. VEMY - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) has a higher volatility of 1.78% compared to Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY) at 1.13%. This indicates that EBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EBNDVEMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

1.13%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.38%

4.52%

+1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.11%

6.02%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.00%

7.52%

+1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.08%

7.52%

+1.56%

EBND vs. VEMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBND has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than VEMY's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

EBND vs. VEMY - Dividend Comparison

EBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, less than VEMY's 8.12% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EBND
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF
5.37%5.54%5.89%5.26%4.75%3.83%3.67%4.68%4.70%2.00%
VEMY
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
8.12%8.89%10.28%9.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EBND and VEMY have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EBND has higher volatility (1.78%) compared to VEMY (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBND dropped -29.51% vs VEMY's -8.77%.

On 3-year performance, VEMY leads with 13.84% vs 5.35% for EBND. On fees, EBND is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, VEMY has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VEMY has performed better with a 13.84% return vs 5.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EBND is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for VEMY.

VEMY has the higher dividend yield at 8.12%, compared with 5.37% for EBND.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EBND and 0.58% for VEMY.

VEMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EBND and VEMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer