EBIZ vs. BEDZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EBIZ (Global X E-commerce ETF) and BEDZ (AdvisorShares Hotel ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. EBIZ is passively managed, while BEDZ is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EBIZ returned -3.65%/yr vs 7.19%/yr for BEDZ. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EBIZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BEDZ.

Performance

EBIZ vs. BEDZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBIZ achieves a -15.29% return, which is significantly lower than BEDZ's 4.81% return.

EBIZ

• 1D: -2.05%
• 1M: -2.71%
• YTD: -15.29%
• 6M: -15.50%
• 1Y: -8.74%
• 3Y*: 17.16%
• 5Y*: -3.65%
• 10Y*: —

BEDZ

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 5.98%
• YTD: 4.81%
• 6M: 8.87%
• 1Y: 17.99%
• 3Y*: 13.23%
• 5Y*: 7.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBIZ vs. BEDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EBIZ Global X E-commerce ETF	-15.29%	17.74%	31.26%	30.88%	-40.96%	-19.63%
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	4.81%	3.46%	18.31%	23.88%	-13.40%	6.49%

Correlation

The correlation between EBIZ and BEDZ is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021	0.68

The correlation between EBIZ and BEDZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

EBIZ vs. BEDZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EBIZ	BEDZ
Consumer Cyclical	75.6%	51.9%
Technology	13.2%	-
Industrials	4.6%	4.1%
Real Estate	2.6%	42.2%
Healthcare	2.1%	-
Communication Services	1.6%	1.5%
Financial Services	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EBIZ vs. BEDZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBIZ

EBIZ Risk / Return Rank: 5
EBIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
EBIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
EBIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5
EBIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
EBIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6

BEDZ

BEDZ Risk / Return Rank: 26
BEDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
BEDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
BEDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 24
BEDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
BEDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBIZ vs. BEDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EBIZ	BEDZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.44	0.89	-1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.49	1.43	-1.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.16	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	1.50	-1.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.65	3.50	-4.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EBIZ vs. BEDZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBIZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the BEDZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBIZ and BEDZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EBIZ	BEDZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.44	0.89	-1.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	0.29	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.31	-0.03

Drawdowns

EBIZ vs. BEDZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBIZ drawdown since its inception was -61.58%, which is greater than BEDZ's maximum drawdown of -29.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIZ and BEDZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBIZ	BEDZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.58%	-29.70%	-31.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.73%	-12.06%	-15.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.73%	-28.31%	+0.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.21%	-29.70%	-28.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.77%	-0.55%	-25.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.33%	-8.08%	-16.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.41%	5.15%	+8.26%

Volatility

EBIZ vs. BEDZ - Volatility Comparison

Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) at 5.12%. This indicates that EBIZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEDZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EBIZ	BEDZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.39%	5.12%	+0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.01%	15.09%	-0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.82%	20.29%	-0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.90%	24.88%	+4.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.68%	24.84%	+3.84%

EBIZ vs. BEDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBIZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BEDZ's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

EBIZ vs. BEDZ - Dividend Comparison

EBIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than BEDZ's 2.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	2.20%	2.31%	0.00%	1.67%	0.21%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%
EBIZ Global X E-commerce ETF	0.60%	0.51%	0.23%	0.00%	0.10%	0.57%	0.84%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EBIZ and BEDZ in my portfolio?

EBIZ and BEDZ have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EBIZ or BEDZ?

EBIZ has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to BEDZ (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBIZ dropped -61.58% vs BEDZ's -29.70%.

Which ETF is better, EBIZ or BEDZ?

On 5-year performance, BEDZ leads with 7.19% vs -3.65% for EBIZ. On fees, EBIZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BEDZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EBIZ or BEDZ?

Over the 5-year period, BEDZ has performed better with a 7.19% return vs -3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EBIZ or BEDZ?

EBIZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BEDZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EBIZ or BEDZ?

BEDZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 0.60% for EBIZ.

What is the main difference between EBIZ and BEDZ?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EBIZ and 0.99% for BEDZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BEDZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.