EBIT vs. LLII

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EBIT (Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF) and LLII (REX LLY Growth & Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EBIT is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners Index, while LLII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX. EBIT is passively managed, while LLII is actively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EBIT charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for LLII.

Performance

EBIT vs. LLII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF (EBIT) and REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBIT achieves a 12.09% return, which is significantly higher than LLII's -4.28% return.

EBIT

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 12.09%
• 6M: 10.33%
• 1Y: 26.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LLII

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 9.79%
• YTD: -4.28%
• 6M: 0.70%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBIT vs. LLII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EBIT Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF	12.09%	3.54%
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF	-4.28%	19.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EBIT and LLII is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025	0.08

Return for Risk

EBIT vs. LLII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBIT

EBIT Risk / Return Rank: 52
EBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
EBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
EBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 45
EBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
EBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBIT vs. LLII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF (EBIT) and REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EBIT	LLII	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.20	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EBIT	LLII	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.71	-0.01

Drawdowns

EBIT vs. LLII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBIT drawdown since its inception was -26.64%, which is greater than LLII's maximum drawdown of -23.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIT and LLII.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBIT	LLII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.64%	-23.96%	-2.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-6.88%	+5.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.55%	-9.28%	+2.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EBIT	LLII	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.99%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.71%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.13%	36.42%	-19.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.24%	36.42%	-15.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.24%	36.42%	-15.18%

EBIT vs. LLII - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBIT has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than LLII's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

EBIT vs. LLII - Dividend Comparison

EBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than LLII's 25.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EBIT Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF	1.78%	2.00%	2.40%
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF	25.95%	5.13%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EBIT and LLII in my portfolio?

EBIT and LLII have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EBIT or LLII?

On fees, EBIT is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EBIT or LLII?

EBIT is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LLII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EBIT or LLII?

LLII has the higher dividend yield at 25.95%, compared with 1.78% for EBIT.

What is the main difference between EBIT and LLII?

EBIT is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while LLII is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for EBIT and 0.99% for LLII.