PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EBIT-U.TO vs. QQQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EBIT-U.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Evolve Bitcoin ETF USD (EBIT-U.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EBIT-U.TO is traded in USD, while QQQT.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the QQQT.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBIT-U.TO achieves a -26.81% return, which is significantly lower than QQQT.TO's 23.13% return.


EBIT-U.TO

1D
1.65%
1M
-2.19%
6M
-33.71%
YTD
-26.81%
1Y
-45.49%
3Y*
27.56%
5Y*
13.31%
10Y*

QQQT.TO

1D
0.64%
1M
-2.85%
6M
24.11%
YTD
23.13%
1Y
43.18%
3Y*
30.55%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBIT-U.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EBIT-U.TO
Evolve Bitcoin ETF USD
-26.81%-6.74%115.98%38.04%
QQQT.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged
23.13%36.28%18.23%14.97%

Correlation

The correlation between EBIT-U.TO and QQQT.TO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023

0.26

The correlation between EBIT-U.TO and QQQT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (3 years) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EBIT-U.TO vs. QQQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBIT-U.TO
EBIT-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
EBIT-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBIT-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBIT-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
EBIT-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBIT-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQT.TO
QQQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
QQQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBIT-U.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Bitcoin ETF USD (EBIT-U.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EBIT-U.TOQQQT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.29

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

2.29

-3.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.37

7.97

-9.34

EBIT-U.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBIT-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the QQQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBIT-U.TO and QQQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EBIT-U.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBIT-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.55%, which is greater than QQQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -32.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIT-U.TO and QQQT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EBIT-U.TOQQQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.55%

-32.71%

-44.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.37%

-18.94%

-35.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.37%

-32.71%

-21.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.57%

-5.66%

-42.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.50%

-6.35%

-28.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.35%

5.43%

+27.92%

Volatility

EBIT-U.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Evolve Bitcoin ETF USD (EBIT-U.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.32% compared to Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) at 9.69%. This indicates that EBIT-U.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EBIT-U.TOQQQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.32%

9.69%

+3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.75%

21.45%

+16.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.29%

25.82%

+20.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.49%

31.21%

+23.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.01%

31.21%

+24.80%

Dividends

EBIT-U.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

EBIT-U.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.


PositionTTM202520242023
EBIT-U.TO
Evolve Bitcoin ETF USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQT.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged
0.24%0.30%0.39%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


EBIT-U.TO and QQQT.TO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EBIT-U.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while QQQT.TO is Nasdaq-100.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EBIT-U.TO and QQQT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer