EBIG.L vs. URNU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EBIG.L (Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and URNU.L (Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - EBIG.L is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while URNU.L is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EBIG.L returned 14.80%/yr vs 35.94%/yr for URNU.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EBIG.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for URNU.L.

Performance

EBIG.L vs. URNU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (EBIG.L) and Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EBIG.L is traded in GBP, while URNU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the URNU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBIG.L achieves a -14.25% return, which is significantly lower than URNU.L's 17.53% return.

EBIG.L

• 1D: 1.50%
• 1M: -0.68%
• YTD: -14.25%
• 6M: -15.56%
• 1Y: -8.06%
• 3Y*: 14.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

URNU.L

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -11.78%
• YTD: 17.53%
• 6M: 6.91%
• 1Y: 60.64%
• 3Y*: 35.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBIG.L vs. URNU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EBIG.L Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	-14.25%	9.95%	33.02%	24.95%	-0.57%
URNU.L Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc	17.53%	58.33%	2.99%	32.92%	3.46%

Correlation

The correlation between EBIG.L and URNU.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2022	0.42

Return for Risk

EBIG.L vs. URNU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBIG.L

EBIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6
EBIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
EBIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
EBIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5
EBIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
EBIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6

URNU.L

URNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 34
URNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
URNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
URNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
URNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
URNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBIG.L vs. URNU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (EBIG.L) and Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EBIG.L	URNU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.42	1.27	-1.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.46	1.89	-2.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.22	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.30	1.99	-2.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.59	4.93	-5.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EBIG.L vs. URNU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBIG.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the URNU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBIG.L and URNU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EBIG.L	URNU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.42	1.27	-1.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.31	0.81	-1.12

Drawdowns

EBIG.L vs. URNU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBIG.L drawdown since its inception was -61.10%, which is greater than URNU.L's maximum drawdown of -39.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIG.L and URNU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBIG.L	URNU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.10%	-39.24%	-21.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.69%	-31.58%	+5.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.57%	-39.24%	+12.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.35%	-14.80%	-20.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.51%	-11.17%	-31.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.87%	12.81%	+0.06%

Volatility

EBIG.L vs. URNU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (EBIG.L) is 4.41%, while Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L) has a volatility of 14.62%. This indicates that EBIG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URNU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EBIG.L	URNU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.41%	14.62%	-10.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.03%	34.61%	-20.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.12%	49.64%	-31.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.21%	39.90%	-10.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.21%	39.90%	-10.69%

EBIG.L vs. URNU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBIG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than URNU.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

EBIG.L vs. URNU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EBIG.L nor URNU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EBIG.L and URNU.L in my portfolio?

EBIG.L and URNU.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EBIG.L or URNU.L?

On fees, EBIG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EBIG.L or URNU.L?

EBIG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for URNU.L.

What is the main difference between EBIG.L and URNU.L?

EBIG.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while URNU.L is Commodity Producers Equities. EBIG.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while URNU.L tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return v2 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EBIG.L and 0.65% for URNU.L.