EBIG.L vs. SILG.L
EBIG.L (Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and SILG.L (Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - EBIG.L is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while SILG.L is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EBIG.L returned 14.80%/yr vs 45.51%/yr for SILG.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EBIG.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SILG.L.
Performance
EBIG.L vs. SILG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBIG.L achieves a -14.25% return, which is significantly lower than SILG.L's 5.62% return.
EBIG.L
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- -14.25%
- 6M
- -15.56%
- 1Y
- -8.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SILG.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -4.68%
- YTD
- 5.62%
- 6M
- 15.75%
- 1Y
- 90.07%
- 3Y*
- 45.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EBIG.L vs. SILG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBIG.L Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | -14.25% | 9.95% | 33.02% | 24.95% | -9.84% |
SILG.L Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 5.62% | 153.98% | 13.53% | -6.34% | -8.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between EBIG.L and SILG.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EBIG.L vs. SILG.L — Risk / Return Rank
EBIG.L
SILG.L
EBIG.L vs. SILG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (EBIG.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBIG.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.31 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 3.16 | -3.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | 7.69 | -8.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBIG.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 | 1.98 | -2.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.31 | 0.68 | -0.99 |
Drawdowns
EBIG.L vs. SILG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBIG.L drawdown since its inception was -61.10%, which is greater than SILG.L's maximum drawdown of -32.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIG.L and SILG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBIG.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.10% | -32.00% | -29.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.69% | -30.90% | +5.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.57% | -30.90% | +4.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.35% | -24.56% | -10.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.51% | -12.52% | -29.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.87% | 12.74% | +0.13% |
Volatility
EBIG.L vs. SILG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (EBIG.L) is 4.41%, while Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) has a volatility of 18.48%. This indicates that EBIG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EBIG.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 18.48% | -14.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.03% | 39.95% | -25.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.12% | 49.23% | -31.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.21% | 39.40% | -10.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.21% | 39.40% | -10.19% |
EBIG.L vs. SILG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBIG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SILG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EBIG.L vs. SILG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EBIG.L nor SILG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EBIG.L and SILG.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EBIG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EBIG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SILG.L.
EBIG.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SILG.L is Silver. EBIG.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while SILG.L tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EBIG.L and 0.65% for SILG.L.
Find the right allocation for EBIG.L and SILG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer