EBIG.L vs. CSTP.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

EBIG.L (Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and CSTP.L (State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - EBIG.L tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR while CSTP.L tracks the MSCI Europe Consumer Staples 35/20 Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EBIG.L returned 13.79%/yr vs 2.72%/yr for CSTP.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EBIG.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for CSTP.L.

Performance

EBIG.L vs. CSTP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (EBIG.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSTP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EBIG.L is traded in GBP, while CSTP.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CSTP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBIG.L achieves a -8.88% return, which is significantly lower than CSTP.L's 5.20% return.

EBIG.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 6.26%
• 6M: -10.84%
• YTD: -8.88%
• 1Y: -4.91%
• 3Y*: 13.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSTP.L

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 4.38%
• 6M: 5.57%
• YTD: 5.20%
• 1Y: 8.63%
• 3Y*: 2.72%
• 5Y*: 2.01%
• 10Y*: 3.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBIG.L vs. CSTP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EBIG.L Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	-8.88%	9.95%	33.02%	24.95%	-34.59%	-36.94%
CSTP.L State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF	5.20%	12.89%	-6.80%	-1.33%	-3.12%	1.34%

Correlation

The correlation between EBIG.L and CSTP.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021	0.20

The correlation between EBIG.L and CSTP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EBIG.L vs. CSTP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBIG.L

EBIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8
EBIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
EBIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
EBIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7
EBIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
EBIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8

CSTP.L

CSTP.L Risk / Return Rank: 25
CSTP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
CSTP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
CSTP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 26
CSTP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CSTP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBIG.L vs. CSTP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (EBIG.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSTP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EBIG.L	CSTP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.26	0.60	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.23	0.96	-1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.12	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	0.64	-0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.34	1.37	-1.70

EBIG.L vs. CSTP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBIG.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the CSTP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBIG.L and CSTP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EBIG.L vs. CSTP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBIG.L drawdown since its inception was -61.10%, which is greater than CSTP.L's maximum drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIG.L and CSTP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBIG.L	CSTP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.10%	-23.51%	-37.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.69%	-13.44%	-12.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.57%	-13.44%	-13.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.87%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.31%	-5.08%	-26.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.29%	-6.56%	-35.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.67%	6.31%	+8.36%

Volatility

EBIG.L vs. CSTP.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (EBIG.L) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSTP.L) at 5.51%. This indicates that EBIG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSTP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EBIG.L	CSTP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.48%	5.51%	+0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.36%	11.91%	+3.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.13%	14.38%	+4.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.05%	13.14%	+15.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.05%	13.96%	+15.09%

EBIG.L vs. CSTP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBIG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CSTP.L's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

EBIG.L vs. CSTP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EBIG.L nor CSTP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EBIG.L and CSTP.L in my portfolio?

EBIG.L and CSTP.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EBIG.L or CSTP.L?

On fees, CSTP.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EBIG.L or CSTP.L?

CSTP.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EBIG.L.

What is the main difference between EBIG.L and CSTP.L?

EBIG.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while CSTP.L tracks MSCI Europe Consumer Staples 35/20 Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EBIG.L and 0.18% for CSTP.L.