EBI vs. YCS
EBI (Longview Advantage ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - EBI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Longview, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). EBI is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Over the past year, EBI returned 32.98% vs 31.36% for YCS. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EBI charges 0.24%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
EBI vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBI achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 9.78% return.
EBI
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 14.81%
- 6M
- 13.81%
- 1Y
- 32.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 31.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
EBI vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EBI Longview Advantage ETF | 14.81% | 15.82% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 9.78% | 17.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between EBI and YCS is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025 | 0.02 |
The correlation between EBI and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EBI vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
EBI
YCS
EBI vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Longview Advantage ETF (EBI) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EBI | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.35 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.67 | 3.79 | +0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.97 | 11.86 | +7.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EBI vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBI drawdown since its inception was -17.05%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBI and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBI | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.05% | -49.56% | +32.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.09% | -8.30% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | 0.00% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.03% | -19.88% | +17.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 2.65% | -0.91% |
Volatility
EBI vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
Longview Advantage ETF (EBI) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.22%. This indicates that EBI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EBI | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 2.22% | +1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.22% | 12.19% | -2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.47% | 16.96% | -4.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.88% | 21.10% | -3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.88% | 18.96% | -1.08% |
EBI vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBI has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
EBI vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
EBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EBI Longview Advantage ETF | 0.92% | 1.05% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EBI and YCS have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EBI has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to YCS (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBI dropped -17.05% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 1-year performance, EBI leads with 32.98% vs 31.36% for YCS. On fees, EBI is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EBI has performed better with a 32.98% return vs 31.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EBI is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
EBI has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
EBI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Longview and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for EBI and 1.00% for YCS.
EBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EBI and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer