EBABX vs. NPCT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EBABX (Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A) and NPCT (Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EBABX returned 0.98%/yr vs -2.48%/yr for NPCT. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EBABX charges 0.73%/yr vs 5.08%/yr for NPCT.

Performance

EBABX vs. NPCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A (EBABX) and Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBABX achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than NPCT's 2.41% return.

EBABX

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 0.12%
• 6M: 0.67%
• 1Y: 5.06%
• 3Y*: 5.64%
• 5Y*: 0.98%
• 10Y*: 3.26%

NPCT

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -0.01%
• YTD: 2.41%
• 6M: 2.31%
• 1Y: 2.01%
• 3Y*: 11.87%
• 5Y*: -2.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBABX vs. NPCT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EBABX Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A	0.12%	8.87%	4.21%	5.30%	-13.08%	2.60%
NPCT Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund	2.41%	9.87%	17.23%	7.78%	-37.50%	-4.98%

Correlation

The correlation between EBABX and NPCT is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2021	0.50

The correlation between EBABX and NPCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EBABX vs. NPCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBABX

EBABX Risk / Return Rank: 25
EBABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
EBABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
EBABX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
EBABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
EBABX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

NPCT

NPCT Risk / Return Rank: 4
NPCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
NPCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
NPCT Omega Ratio Rank: 4
NPCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
NPCT Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBABX vs. NPCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A (EBABX) and Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EBABX	NPCT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	0.21	+1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	0.39	+1.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.04	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	0.30	+1.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.78	0.69	+4.09

EBABX vs. NPCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBABX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the NPCT Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBABX and NPCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EBABX vs. NPCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBABX drawdown since its inception was -17.19%, smaller than the maximum NPCT drawdown of -46.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBABX and NPCT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBABX	NPCT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.19%	-46.77%	+29.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.27%	-6.79%	+3.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.68%	-12.59%	+6.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.19%	-46.77%	+29.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.75%	-16.85%	+15.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.64%	-25.13%	+21.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.13%	2.91%	-1.78%

Volatility

EBABX vs. NPCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A (EBABX) is 1.17%, while Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT) has a volatility of 2.57%. This indicates that EBABX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NPCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EBABX	NPCT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.17%	2.57%	-1.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.01%	7.22%	-4.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.94%	9.78%	-5.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.33%	13.13%	-7.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.68%	13.03%	-8.35%

EBABX vs. NPCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBABX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than NPCT's 5.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

EBABX vs. NPCT - Dividend Comparison

EBABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, less than NPCT's 12.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EBABX Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A	4.90%	4.89%	5.31%	3.83%	3.77%	3.23%	3.64%	3.71%	3.89%	3.29%	3.66%	5.41%
NPCT Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund	12.40%	13.15%	12.20%	10.28%	11.93%	3.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EBABX and NPCT in my portfolio?

EBABX and NPCT have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EBABX or NPCT?

NPCT has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to EBABX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBABX dropped -17.19% vs NPCT's -46.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EBABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.