EBABX vs. LMSMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EBABX (Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A) and LMSMX (Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, EBABX returned 1.17%/yr vs -1.89%/yr for LMSMX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EBABX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for LMSMX.

Performance

EBABX vs. LMSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A (EBABX) and Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund (LMSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBABX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than LMSMX's 1.11% return.

EBABX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.59%
• YTD: 0.41%
• 6M: 0.49%
• 1Y: 6.18%
• 3Y*: 5.78%
• 5Y*: 1.17%
• 10Y*: 3.33%

LMSMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 1.11%
• 6M: 1.33%
• 1Y: 8.61%
• 3Y*: 4.81%
• 5Y*: -1.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBABX vs. LMSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EBABX Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A	0.41%	8.87%	4.21%	5.30%	-13.08%	2.76%	5.62%	10.54%	-1.09%	5.64%
LMSMX Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund	1.11%	12.15%	-1.72%	5.13%	-23.44%	-2.32%	12.86%	7.71%	1.46%	5.52%

Correlation

The correlation between EBABX and LMSMX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017	0.77

The correlation between EBABX and LMSMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.89 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EBABX vs. LMSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBABX

EBABX Risk / Return Rank: 28
EBABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
EBABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
EBABX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
EBABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
EBABX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

LMSMX

LMSMX Risk / Return Rank: 43
LMSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LMSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
LMSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
LMSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
LMSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBABX vs. LMSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A (EBABX) and Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund (LMSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EBABX	LMSMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.61	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	2.50	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.32	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	3.28	-1.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.85	8.74	-2.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EBABX vs. LMSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBABX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the LMSMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBABX and LMSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EBABX	LMSMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	1.61	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	-0.18	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.17	+0.60

Drawdowns

EBABX vs. LMSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBABX drawdown since its inception was -17.19%, smaller than the maximum LMSMX drawdown of -30.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBABX and LMSMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBABX	LMSMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.19%	-30.76%	+13.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.27%	-2.64%	-0.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.68%	-10.50%	+4.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.19%	-30.18%	+12.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.47%	-12.55%	+11.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.65%	-10.12%	+6.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	0.99%	+0.07%

Volatility

EBABX vs. LMSMX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A (EBABX) has a higher volatility of 1.52% compared to Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund (LMSMX) at 1.31%. This indicates that EBABX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EBABX	LMSMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.52%	1.31%	+0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.96%	2.68%	+0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.95%	5.41%	-1.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.31%	10.38%	-5.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.68%	8.16%	-3.48%

EBABX vs. LMSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBABX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than LMSMX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

EBABX vs. LMSMX - Dividend Comparison

EBABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than LMSMX's 4.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EBABX Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A	4.88%	4.89%	5.31%	3.83%	3.77%	3.23%	3.64%	3.71%	3.89%	3.29%	3.66%	5.41%
LMSMX Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund	4.40%	4.20%	5.24%	4.68%	3.40%	3.78%	6.84%	7.19%	3.18%	3.24%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EBABX and LMSMX in my portfolio?

EBABX and LMSMX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EBABX or LMSMX?

EBABX has higher volatility (1.52%) compared to LMSMX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBABX dropped -17.19% vs LMSMX's -30.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LMSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.